지리산과 태산, 한중 유람문학의 두 초상
Mt. Jiri and Mt. Taishan, Two Portraits of Korean and Chinese Excursion Literature
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents an investigation into the aspects of Korean and Chinese excursion literature with a focus on the excursion works on Mt. Jiri in Korea and Mt. Taishan in China. Excursions to Mt. Jiri continued among a certain class of gentlemen during Joseon for hundreds of years. Those who were from the Mt. Jiri areas intensively created excursion works to the mountain. On the other hand, various classes of noted figures including the emperors made an excursion to Mt. Taishan. Figures of diverse propensities created excursion works to Mt. Taishan over several centuries. Those who came from distant places accounted for an absolute majority of the writers rather than those who were from the Mt. Taishan areas, which is a clear point of differentiation and characteristic between the excursions and excursion literature of Mt. Jiri and those of Mt. Taishan. It is closely connected to the representative forms identified in the excursion works of the two mountains. For instance, there is a clear difference between the perception of Mt. Taishan that it was "Mountain of the Emperor" for which the emperors held a religious ceremony and that of Mt. Jiri that it was "Mountain in the Shape of the Emperor" described in the excursion poems to the mountain. There have been plenty of researches on excursions to Mt. Jiri from various angles, but Mt. Taishan and excursions to the mountain have not been generalized in the academic circles in spite of their considerable influences on Korea's legacy culture. The study is significant in that it is the first research to compare and examine the excursion literature of two mountains representing Korea and China, respectively.
Abstract
This paper presents an investigation into the aspects of Korean and Chinese excursion literature with a focus on the excursion works on Mt. Jiri in Korea and Mt. Taishan in China. Excursions to Mt. Jiri continued among a certain class of gentlemen during Joseon for hundreds of years. Those who were from the Mt. Jiri areas intensively created excursion works to the mountain. On the other hand, various classes of noted figures including the emperors made an excursion to Mt. Taishan. Figures of diverse propensities created excursion works to Mt. Taishan over several centuries. Those who came from distant places accounted for an absolute majority of the writers rather than those who were from the Mt. Taishan areas, which is a clear point of differentiation and characteristic between the excursions and excursion literature of Mt. Jiri and those of Mt. Taishan. It is closely connected to the representative forms identified in the excursion works of the two mountains. For instance, there is a clear difference between the perception of Mt. Taishan that it was "Mountain of the Emperor" for which the emperors held a religious ceremony and that of Mt. Jiri that it was "Mountain in the Shape of the Emperor" described in the excursion poems to the mountain. There have been plenty of researches on excursions to Mt. Jiri from various angles, but Mt. Taishan and excursions to the mountain have not been generalized in the academic circles in spite of their considerable influences on Korea's legacy culture. The study is significant in that it is the first research to compare and examine the excursion literature of two mountains representing Korea and China, respectively.
참고문헌 (28)
- 강정화, "지리산 유산기 선집" (2008), 도서출판 브레인
- 강정화, "한말 지식인의 지리산 유람", 동방한문학, (53), pp.55~81 (2012), 동방한문학회
- 권오영, "19세기 江右學者들의 학문동향", 남명학연구, 11 (2001), 경상대 남명학연구소
- 김민정, "18~19세기의 백두산 기행로 및 기행 양식", 석사, 지리교육, pp.2006
- 박진영, "15세기~17세기 금강산유람기 연구", 석사, 한문교육, pp.2005
- 심우영, "泰山, 시의 숲을 거닐다" (2010), 차이나하우스
- 이성혜, "사림들의 유람 입문서, 김종직의 유두류록", 경남학, 31 (2010), 경상대학교 경남문화연구원
- 이종묵, "遊山의 풍속과 遊記類의 전통", 고전문학연구, 12 (1997), 한국고전문학회
- 이주해, "오악(五嶽)과 중국 고대 산문", 인문과학, 88, pp.59~95 (2008), 인문학연구원
- 전인초, "오악(五嶽)의 신화 전설", 인문과학, 88, pp.1~28 (2008), 인문학연구원
- 최석기, "晩醒 朴致馥의 南冥學 繼承樣相", 南冥學硏究, (23), pp.219~262 (2007), 경남문화연구원
- 최석기, "함양지역 사대부들의 지리산유람록에 나타난 정신세계", 경남학, 31 (2010), 경상대학교 경남문화연구원
- 최석기, "선인들의 지리산 유람록 2~4" (2008), 보고사
- 최석기, "선인들의 지리산 유람록 5" (2013), (도서출판)보고사
- 최석기, "선인들의 지리산 유람록" (2000), 돌베개
- 최석기, "태산, 그 문화를 논하다" (2011), 민속원
- 최석기, "지리산과 유람문학" (2013), 보고사
- 楊貴仁, "泰山文獻集成(10卷)" (2005), 泰山出版社
- 余悦, "王思任的山水情結與審美感悟", 鄱陽湖學刊 (2010), 江西省社會科學院
- 王達敏, "<登泰山記>硏究與詮釋界限", 河南敎育院學報, 25 (2006), 科學社會科學院
- 王璐, "歷代帝王名士的泰山旅游活動", 黑龍江史志, (05) (2012), 黑龍江省地方史志學會
- 王立群, "論山水遊記的起源和形成", 南京理工大學學報, 10(4) (1997), 哲學社會科學版
- 汪子卿, "泰山志校證" (2006), 黃山書舍
- 王傳明, "于愼行詩文選" (2009), 濟南出版社
- 袁愛國, "人文泰山-泰山與中國名人文化", 泰山學院學報, 31 (2009), 泰山學院
- 劉凌, "泰山詩的儒意道意與禪意", 岱宗學刊, 6 (2002), 泰安宗敎學院
- 周郢, "泰山古代香客店考", 岱宗學刊, 2 (1999), 泰安教育学院
- 哈嘉莹, "山水游記與山水游記的時代特色", 廊坊師範學院學報 (2000), 廊坊師範學院
