본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중화인민공화국 물권법(2007년)의 물권변동에 관한 연구 - 현행법의 구성과 주요내용을 중심으로 -

A Study on the real right alternation in the Real Right Law of the People's Republic of China(2007)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

In this study we research the real right alternation and transfer system of the Real Right Law in the Peoples Republic of China(2007)(hereafter referred to as real right law, unless otherwise provided). It is also the second part of our previous study, which treated important but a little theoretical problems as to so-called juridical act of real rights and the real rights transfer system in the chinese civil law,mainly focused on its various doctrines and its arguments. But now we will cover the contents of the real rights altenation and its adoption in the chinese law,focusing on the content of legal texts after enactment. After a brief survey of the legislative process and the drafts, we enter the two broad questions accoding to the legal text and its meaning, in some cases, depending on its desirable and logical order. To begin with, the real right law provides the principle of distinction between the result of property rights and its causal acts(articles 15). Next, as to the real rights transfer systems, the law adopts,according to the dominant doctrine,the creation mode of publication,more precisely, the coexistence system of transference will and publication modes. According to the present law, in transferring of immovable property rights caused by juridical acts, in principle, are required an juristic act and its registration (articles 6, 9,14,23 etc.). For example,the creation, alteration, alienation or termination of the real right of a realt right shall be subject to registration in accordance with law(art. 6(1)). On the other hand, in the movable property,an juristic act and its delivery are required(art. 23), which says, unless it is otherwise prescribed by any law, the creation or alienation of the real right of a chattel shall come into effect upon delivery. But in some cases as ships, aircraft etc., is required the registration of movables. The creation, alteration, alienation or termination of the real right of any vessel, aircraft or motor vehicle and so on may not challenge any bona fide third party if it is not registered(art. 24). Nevertheless, there are some exceptions against this principle, which takes the mode of defense of publication(articles 24,129, 158,and 189). We can give some examples like the right to the contracted management of land(art. 129), the easement(art. 158) and the mortgage of the chattels(art. 189) etc. Finally, the transfer caused by non-juridical acts, such as inheritance,judicial decision, etc.(articles 28 to 30) don't require the registration, which is only required on its disposal. Despite this study, it is needed more study about its related topics, such as, unauthorized disposition, unjustified enrichment and bona fide acquisition, inopposability to a third person in good faith in case of a null or voidable juristic act etc,for our systematic compairison of the real rights law between Korea and China.

Abstract

In this study we research the real right alternation and transfer system of the Real Right Law in the Peoples Republic of China(2007)(hereafter referred to as real right law, unless otherwise provided). It is also the second part of our previous study, which treated important but a little theoretical problems as to so-called juridical act of real rights and the real rights transfer system in the chinese civil law,mainly focused on its various doctrines and its arguments. But now we will cover the contents of the real rights altenation and its adoption in the chinese law,focusing on the content of legal texts after enactment. After a brief survey of the legislative process and the drafts, we enter the two broad questions accoding to the legal text and its meaning, in some cases, depending on its desirable and logical order. To begin with, the real right law provides the principle of distinction between the result of property rights and its causal acts(articles 15). Next, as to the real rights transfer systems, the law adopts,according to the dominant doctrine,the creation mode of publication,more precisely, the coexistence system of transference will and publication modes. According to the present law, in transferring of immovable property rights caused by juridical acts, in principle, are required an juristic act and its registration (articles 6, 9,14,23 etc.). For example,the creation, alteration, alienation or termination of the real right of a realt right shall be subject to registration in accordance with law(art. 6(1)). On the other hand, in the movable property,an juristic act and its delivery are required(art. 23), which says, unless it is otherwise prescribed by any law, the creation or alienation of the real right of a chattel shall come into effect upon delivery. But in some cases as ships, aircraft etc., is required the registration of movables. The creation, alteration, alienation or termination of the real right of any vessel, aircraft or motor vehicle and so on may not challenge any bona fide third party if it is not registered(art. 24). Nevertheless, there are some exceptions against this principle, which takes the mode of defense of publication(articles 24,129, 158,and 189). We can give some examples like the right to the contracted management of land(art. 129), the easement(art. 158) and the mortgage of the chattels(art. 189) etc. Finally, the transfer caused by non-juridical acts, such as inheritance,judicial decision, etc.(articles 28 to 30) don't require the registration, which is only required on its disposal. Despite this study, it is needed more study about its related topics, such as, unauthorized disposition, unjustified enrichment and bona fide acquisition, inopposability to a third person in good faith in case of a null or voidable juristic act etc,for our systematic compairison of the real rights law between Korea and China.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 김성수, "중국의 2007년 新물권법(「중화인민공화국 물권법」)에 관한 연구(1)ㆍ(2)ㆍ(3)ㆍ(4)-입법과정과 조문내용을 중심으로-", 사법행정, 48(6) (2007)
  2. 김성수, "중국의 물권법초안(2002년ㆍ2005년)에 관한 서론적 연구(1)", 경찰대 논문집, 26 (2006)
  3. 김성수, "중국 현행 물권법의 물권변동에 관한 연구-현행법의 내용을 중심으로", 재산법학회 2009년 춘계대회 발표문 (2009), 부산대학교
  4. 김성수, "중국민법에서 물권변동에 관한 서론적 연구", 아시아민상법학, (2) (2009)
  5. 김영규, "중국 물권법의 초안에 나타난 물권법총칙의 성격과 특색", 법학연구, (20), pp.137~160 (2005), 한국법학회
  6. 신봉근, "중국 부동산등기제도의 법리", 비교사법, 16(2), pp.297~321 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
  7. 임호, "중국 부동산등기제도에 관한 연구 :「물권법」을 중심으로", 외국법제정보, (8) (2007)
  8. 장석천, "중국의 부동산 등기제도와 불권변동", 재산법연구, 23(1), pp.343~373 (2006), 한국재산법학회
  9. 한기종, "중국 전통사회에 있어서의 “물권” -중국물권법의 제정과 시행을 계기로-", 중국법연구, 12, pp.201~212 (2010), 한중법학회
  10. 갈운송, "중국 신 "물권법" 요람", 민사법학, 39(39-2), pp.131~185 (2007), 한국민사법학회
  11. 梁慧星, "物权法, 第四版" (2007), 法律出版社
  12. 梁慧星, "物权法草案建议稿" (2000), 社会科学文献出版社
  13. 王利明, "物权法研究(修订版)(上卷ㆍ下卷)," (2007), 中国人民大学出版社
  14. 王利明, "中国物权法教程" (2007), 人民法院出版社
  15. 王利明, "民法学,第二版" (2008), 法律出版社
  16. 王利明, "物权法名家讲坛" (2008), 中国人民大学出版社
  17. 梅夏英, "物权法教程" (2007), 中国人民大学出版社
  18. 江平, "中和人民共和国物权法精解" (2007), 中国政法大学出版社
  19. 江平, "物权法" (2009), 法律出版社
  20. 江平, "中国物权法教程" (2007), 知识产权出版社
  21. 孙淑云, "物权法" (2009), 中国政法大学出版社
  22. 孙宪忠, "论物权法(修订版)," (2008), 法律出版社
  23. 孙宪忠, "中国物权总论(第二版)" (2009), 法律出版社
  24. 陈光华, "物权变动要件论" (2009), 知识产权出版社
  25. 滕晓春, "中华人民共和国物权法" (2007), 立信会计出版社
  26. 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室, "中华人民共和国物权法:条文说明ㆍ立法理由及相关规定" (2007), 北京大学出版社
  27. 胡康生, "中华人民共和国物权法释义" (2007), 法律出版社
  28. 郭明瑞, "中华人民共和国物权法释义" (2007), 中国法制出版社
  29. 全国人大常委会法工委, "中华人民共和国物权法释义" (2007), 法律出版社
  30. 本书编写组, "中华人民共和国物权法释义" (2007), 中国经济出版社
  31. 黄松有, "中华人民共和国物权法条文理解与使用" (2007), 人民法院出版社
  32. 王宝发, "物权法实用问答" (2007), 法律出版社
  33. 王利明, "全国人大常委会法制工作委员会. in: 中华人民共和国物权法解读" (2007), 中国法制出版社
  34. 姚红, "全国人大常委会法制工作委员会. in: 中华人民共和国物权法精解" (2007), 人民出版社
  35. 马特, "物权变动" (2007), 中国法制出版社
  36. 马新彦, "物权法" (2007), 科学出版社
  37. 韩松, "物权法" (2007), 法律出版社
  38. 孟勤国, "物权二元结构论" (2002), 人民法院出版社
  39. 田士永, "物权行为理论研究" (2002), 中国政法大学出版社
  40. 肖厚国, "物权变动研究" (2002), 法律出版社
  41. 王轶, "物权变动论" (2001), 中国人民大学出版社
  42. 王茵, "不动产物权变动和交易安全(日德法三国物权变动模式的比较研究)" (2004), 商务印书馆
  43. 陳櫻琴, "中國大陸新物權法簡析" (2008), 五南圖書出版公司
  44. 謝哲勝, "中國民法" (2007), 新學林
  45. 何志, "担保法判解研究与适用" (1999), 中国政法大学出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)