본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

婚姻中 財産分割制度

Issues of Splitting the Property during Marriage

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Abstract

The present Korean Civil Law does not permit matrimonial property system to split the property during marriage. These issues were discussed on Reform Committee of Korean Parliament. By French Civil Code, where through the disorder of the affairs, misadministration or misconduct of one spouse, it appears that the upholding of the community imperils the interest of the other spouse, the latter may sue in court for separation of property, but any voluntary separation is void. By German Civil Code, if the spouses have lived apart for at least three years, either from them may institute proceedings for premature equalisation of the accrued gains and in other cases premature equalisation of accrued gains are possible. Those are first, a spouse may institute proceedings for premature equalisation of accrued gains if the other spouse for a long period culpably failed to discharge his financial duties which arise from the marital relationship and it is to be assumed that he will not discharge them in future either, second a spouse may institute proceedings for premature equalisation of accrued gains if the other spouse has entered into a legal transaction without the necessary approval or has reduced his assets and a substantial endangerment of the future equalisation claim is to be feared, and third a spouse may institute proceedings for premature equalisation of accrued gains if the other spouse persistently refuses without adequate reason to inform him of the inventory of his assets. Under Korean Civil Law similar with German Civil Code, premature equalisations of accrued gains demand our serous consideration, when spouses are living apart and if the other spouse for a long period culpably failed to discharge his financial duties which arise from the marital relationship and it is to be assumed that he will not discharge them in future either.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 명순구, "프랑스 민법전" (2004), 법문사
  2. 田中周友, "佛蘭西民法(III), 財産取得法(2)", 有奜閣
  3. 佐藤良雄, "夫婦財産契約論 , 成城大學法學部硏究叢書", 千倉書房
  4. 김주수, "친족․상속법(제6전정판)" (2002), 법문사
  5. 이화숙, "비교부부재산관계법" (2000), 세창출판사
  6. 김유미, "재산분할(청구권)에 대한 한·일 비교", 2008년도 한일가족법학회 부산대회, ~
  7. 원용수, "우리나라 가족법상 부부재산제도의 문제점과 그 해결 방안에 관한 연구" (1992), 아시아여성연구
  8. 이혜진, "하급심 사례를 통해본 재산분할 - 분할의 대상과 분할비율의 산정을 중심으로 -", 동아법학, (43), pp.297~328 (2009), 법학연구소
  9. 윤진수, "民法改正案 중 夫婦財産制에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 21(1), pp.107~132 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  10. 전경근, "현행 민법상 부부재산제의 문제점과 개선방안", 가족법연구, 19(1), pp.177~219 (2005), 한국가족법학회
  11. 전경근, "부부재산제 개정안에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 20(3), pp.47~72 (2006), 한국가족법학회
  12. 조미경, "서독부부재산법에 있어서의 잉여공동제 ,민사법학의 제문제 소봉김용한교수화갑 기념" (1990), 박영사
  13. 조은희, "유럽부부재산제의 입법례가 우리에게 주는 시사점", 비교사법, 12(2), pp.35~69 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
  14. 조은희, "부부재산제 개선방안에 관한 연구", 한국여성개발원, ~, pp.연구보고서 (2004)
  15. 홍춘의, "프랑스법에 있어서 법정부부재산제 - 공통제의 구성과 관리를 중심으로", 가족법연구, 15(1) (2001)
  16. J. Mayer, "Beck‘scher Online-Kommentar zum BGB", ~ (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)