학생들의 탐구 학습을 돕기 위한 교사의 과학적 개념 설명 방식: 초등학교 5, 6학년 지구과학 영역을 중심으로
Elementary School Teachers' Scientific Explanation to Support Students' Inquiry: Focusing on 5th and 6th Grade Earth Science Curriculum
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
This study aims to explore how teachers construct scientific explanation during instructional practices to help students' scientific inquiry. Before investigating teachers' classroom practices, elementary school science curriculum was examined to identify scientific concepts, particularly in earth science. Then, a total of six teachers' scientific explanation in actual teaching practices was analysed focusing on a) explanation of scientific concepts; b) rationale for scientific explanation; c) connection between scientific explanation and everyday explanation. The findings are as follows. First, the science curriculum provides 1～2 main scientific concepts per unit, which are mostly appeared in the unit title. Those concepts and sub-concepts are not explicitly described but embedded in students' inquiry activities. Second, the teachers explain scientific concepts and discuss the rationale behind the scientific explanation, but rarely connect scientific explanation to everyday explanation. Also, the level of scientific explanations is low remaining level 1 or 2, not reaching 3, the highest level. Based on the results, the study suggests a) teachers need to provide explicit and clear explanations about scientific concepts; b) teachers are required to connect scientific explanation and everyday explanation; c) the level of teachers scientific explanation should be elevated by using an evidence, reasoning and claim, the components of scientific explanation as well as introducing new scientific concepts and inquiry activities.
참고문헌 (34)
- 교육부, "초중등학교 교육과정", 교육부 고시 제 1997- 15호, ~ (1997)
- 교육인적자원부, "초등학교 과학 5-1, 5-2" (2007), 대한교과서
- 교육인적자원부, "초등학교 교사용 지도서 5-1, 5-2" (2002), 대한교과서
- 교육인적자원부, "초등학교 과학 6-1, 6-2" (2007), 대한교과서
- 교육인적자원부, "초등학교 교사용 지도서 6-1, 6-2" (2002), 대한교과서
- 교육인적자원부, "초등학교교육과정", 교육인적자원부 고시 제 2007-79호, ~ (2007)
- 권난주, "학문과 학자가 요구하는 초등학교 수준의 물리분야 기본개념과 교과와 교사가 인지하고 표현하는 기본개념의 일치도 연구", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.535~550 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김장수, "구성주의 교수전략이 아동들의 힘개념 변화에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.2000
- 서예원, "한국과 미국의 초등학교 과학 교과서 비교 연구: 3학년 물질 영역의 과학적 개념 및 탐구 과정을 중심으로", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.509~524 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 송진웅, "학생의 물리 오개념 지도" (2004), (주)북스힐
- 이경숙, "힘과 운동에 대한 초등교사 및 과학 교과서의 과학사적 관점 분석", 석사, pp.2003
- 임영택, "물체의 낙하에 관한 초등학생의 개념유형과 인지갈등정도", 석사, pp.2003
- Bell, P., "Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE", International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), pp.797~817 (2000)
- Bybee, R. W., "Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices" (1997), Heinemann
- Champagne, A. B., "Scientific literacy: A concept in search of definition is This year in school science: Scientific literacy", pp.1~14 (1989), AAAS
- Chin, C., "Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), pp.109~138 (2000)
- Drier, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84, pp.287~312 (2000)
- Duschl, R. A., "Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education", Studies in Science Education, 38, pp.39~72 (2002)
- Hurd, P. DeH, "Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools", Educational Leadership, 16, pp.13~16 (1958)
- Kelly, G. J., "Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing", Science Education, 86, pp.314~342 (2002)
- Krajcik, J., "Modern content and the enterprise of science: Science education in the twentieth century in Education across a century: The centennial volume" (2001), NSSE
- Laugksch, R. C., "Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview", Science Education, 84(1), pp.71~94 (2000)
- Laugksch, R. C., "Development of a pool of scientific literacy test-items based on selected AAAS literacy goals", Science Education, 80(2), pp.121~143 (1996)
- Marx, R. W., "Enacting project-based science", The Elementary School Journal, 97, pp.341~358 (1997)
- McNeill, K. L., "Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers' instructional practices on student learning", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), pp.53~78 (2008)
- McNeill, K. L., "Identifying teacher practices that support students' explanation in science", annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2005)
- Moje, E., "Maestro, what is quality?: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), pp.469~498 (2001)
- National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
- Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.)" (1990), Sage Publications, Inc.
- Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, "Creativity: Find it, promote it (A teacher's guide to using the video)" (2005), QCA
- Remillard, J. T., "Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula", Review of Educational Research, 75, pp.211~246 (2005)
- Sandoval, W. A., "Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, pp.5~51 (2003)
- Tabak, I., "Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns in distributed scaffolding", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), pp.305~335 (2004)