초등학생의 인지 수준에 따른 과학의 본성에 대한 명시적 교수 효과 분석
The Effects of Explicit Instruction about Nature of Science by Elementary School Student's Cognitive Level
2
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we investigated the effects of explicit instruction about nature of science by elementary school students' cognitive level. Participants were six classes, 187 sixth graders at elementary schools in Daegu. Three classes were assigned to control groups and the other classes to treatment groups. Control groups were provided normal instructions and treatment groups were provided instructions integrated with nature of science about chapter 'electromagnet' for 9 class periods. The results of this study were as follow. Both low-cognitive level students and high-cognitive level students in the treatment groups are improved in understanding about nature of science by the explicit instructions about nature of science. Especially, the high-cognitive level students had more improvement than the low-cognitive level students in understanding about nature of science by the explicit instructions about nature of science. There were no significant differences between the test scores of the two groups in the science interest sub-domain of the science-related affective domain. But, there were significant differences between the test scores of the two groups in curiosity and open-mindedness of the scientific attitudes sub-domain of the science-related affective domain.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the effects of explicit instruction about nature of science by elementary school students' cognitive level. Participants were six classes, 187 sixth graders at elementary schools in Daegu. Three classes were assigned to control groups and the other classes to treatment groups. Control groups were provided normal instructions and treatment groups were provided instructions integrated with nature of science about chapter 'electromagnet' for 9 class periods. The results of this study were as follow. Both low-cognitive level students and high-cognitive level students in the treatment groups are improved in understanding about nature of science by the explicit instructions about nature of science. Especially, the high-cognitive level students had more improvement than the low-cognitive level students in understanding about nature of science by the explicit instructions about nature of science. There were no significant differences between the test scores of the two groups in the science interest sub-domain of the science-related affective domain. But, there were significant differences between the test scores of the two groups in curiosity and open-mindedness of the scientific attitudes sub-domain of the science-related affective domain.
참고문헌 (40)
- 교육부, "과학과 교육 과정" (1998), 문교부
- 김경순, "중학교 과학 ‘물질의 구성’ 단원에서 과학사 소재를 활용한 명시적ㆍ반성적 과학의 본성 수업의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(1), pp.89~99 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- 김지나, "초등학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 명시적 교수 효과 분석", 초등과학교육, 27(3), pp.261~272 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김효남, "국가수준의 과학에 관련된 정의적 특성의 평가체제 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 18(3), pp.357~369 (1998)
- 노태희, "과학·기술과 사회의 관계 및 과학이 본성에 대한 고등학생들의 견해", 사대논총, 55, pp.89~116 (1997), 서울대학교
- 노태희, "과학의 본성에 대한 초등학생들의 견해", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(5), pp.882~891 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
- 문성숙, "학습자의 역학적 에너지에 대한 개념변화 중에 살펴본 물리지식과 앎에 대한 인식론적 신념간의 관계", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), pp.499~518 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 원정애, "초등학생들의 과학에 대한 인식론적 신념에 따른 과학 개념변화 과정", 박사, pp.2006
- 이주연, "초등학생의 과학에 대한 인식론적 신념과 학습자 특성과의 관련성 분석", 초등과학교육, 25(2), pp.167~178 (2006), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 노태희, "중학생의 과학 지식의 본성에 대한 이해와 개념 이해 및 학습 전략 사이의 관계", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(5), pp.563~570 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
- 최준환, "과학사를 활용한 과학수업을 통한 교사 및 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해의 발달", 박사, pp.2008
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., "The influence of history of science course on students' views of nature of sciecnce", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), pp.1057~1095 (2000)
- Aikenhead, G. S., "An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), pp.607~629 (1988)
- Aikenhead, G. S., "Views on science-technology-society", Form CDN. mc. 5 (1989), Univ. of Saskatchewan
- Akerson, V. L., "Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), pp.377~394 (2006)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Science for all Americans" (1990), Oxford University Press
- Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report, "American Association for the Advancement of Science", Oxford University Press, ~ (1993)
- Basseches, M., "Dialectical schemata: A framework for the empirical study of the development of dialectical thinking", Human Development, 23, pp.400~421 (1980)
- Brickhouse, N., "Teachers' beliefs about the nature of sceince and their relation to classroom practice", Journal of Teacher Education, 41, pp.53~62 (1990)
- Buehl, M. M., "Beliefs about academic knowledge", Educatianal Psychology Review, 13(4), pp.385~418 (2001)
- Chandler, M. J., "Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, pp.370~395 (1990)
- Driver, R., "Young people's images of science" (1996), Open University Press
- Elder, A. D., "Characterizing fifth grade students' epistemological beliefs in science. in: Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing", pp.347~364 (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Hodson, D., "Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum", Science Education, 72(1), pp.19~40 (1988)
- Inhelder, B., "The growth of logical thinking: from childhood to adolescence" (1958), Basic
- Khisfe, R., "Influence of explicit and reflective views versus implicit 'inquiry orientated' instruction on sixth graders views of the nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), pp.551~578 (2002)
- Lederman, N. G., "Avoiding de- natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. in: The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies" (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Lederman, N. G., "Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change", Science Education, 74(2), pp.225~239 (1990)
- Meichtry, Y. J., "Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.389~407 (1992)
- Metz, K., "Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction", Review of Educational Research, 65(2), pp.93~127 (1995)
- Montgomery, D. E., "Young children's theory of knowing: The development of a folk epistemology", Developmental Review, 12, pp.410~430 (1992)
- Moss, D. M., "Can we be scientists, too? Secondary students' perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(2), pp.149~161 (1998)
- National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academic Press
- National Science Teachers Association, "NSTA position statement on school science education for the 70's", The Science Teacher, 38, pp.46~51 (1971)
- Roadrangka, V., "The construction and validation of Group Assessment of Logical Thinking (GALT)", Paper presented at the 56th annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (1983)
- Roth, W., "Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), pp.5~30 (1994)
- Ryan, A. G., "Students' preconceptions about the epistemology of science", Science Education, 76(6), pp.559~580 (1992)
- Smith, C. L., "Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science", Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), pp.349~422 (2000)
- Solomon, J., "Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.409~421 (1992)
- Solomon, J., "Large-scale exploration of pupils' understanding of the nature of science", Science Education, 80(5), pp.493~508 (1996)