과학적 실험과 공학적 실험에서 초등교사의 수업 과정 분석
Analysis of Elementary School Teachers' Laboratory Instruction Process through Experiments from Science Laboratory and Engineering Laboratory
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to analyze of how the elementary school teachers lead their classes of a science laboratory instruction and an engineering laboratory instruction in a science subject class. For this study, science laboratory and engineering laboratory lessons were selected and for each science and engineering laboratory lesson, five elementary school teachers were video-recorded of their lessons. The science and engineering laboratory lessons were analyzed by utilizing processes of the science model and the engineering model based on Schauble et al. (1991). The results of these studies are as follows: In science laboratory instruction, some participants didn't distinguish the difference between the science laboratory goal and the engineering laboratory goal. All of participants used search and end strategy of engineering laboratory for science laboratory lesson. In engineering laboratory instruction, all of participants guided to students engineering laboratory goal and used inferences and search strategy of engineering laboratory. However they didn't use the trial and error strategy or redesign which can be an essential element in engineering and design process. Educational implications are discussed.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze of how the elementary school teachers lead their classes of a science laboratory instruction and an engineering laboratory instruction in a science subject class. For this study, science laboratory and engineering laboratory lessons were selected and for each science and engineering laboratory lesson, five elementary school teachers were video-recorded of their lessons. The science and engineering laboratory lessons were analyzed by utilizing processes of the science model and the engineering model based on Schauble et al. (1991). The results of these studies are as follows: In science laboratory instruction, some participants didn't distinguish the difference between the science laboratory goal and the engineering laboratory goal. All of participants used search and end strategy of engineering laboratory for science laboratory lesson. In engineering laboratory instruction, all of participants guided to students engineering laboratory goal and used inferences and search strategy of engineering laboratory. However they didn't use the trial and error strategy or redesign which can be an essential element in engineering and design process. Educational implications are discussed.
참고문헌 (46)
- 고한중, "제 7차 교육과정에 의한 초등하교 과학 교과서의 STS 내용 분석", 초등과학교육, 21(2), pp.289~296 (2002), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김재우, "중학생의 교과서 실험 수행에서 나타난 문제점: 실험 목표와 관련 변인 인식 및 인식한 목표와 도출된 결론의 관련성", 한국과학교육학회지, 18(1), pp.35~42 (1998)
- 김진수, "기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색", 한국기술교육학회지, 7(3), pp.1~29 (2007), 한국기술교육학회
- 김희경, "과학 실험 목적에 대한 중학생의 인식 조사", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), pp.254~264 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 양일호, "초등 과학 교사들의 수업에서 나타나는 교수 행동 요소와 수업 유형 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), pp.565~582 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 이기준, "공학과 과학과 기술의 개념", 공학교육, 2(4), pp.5~7 (1996)
- 전세경, "2009개정 교육과정을 통해 본 실과 교과에 대한 도전과 전망", 한국실과교육학회지, 23(1), pp.1~28 (2010), 한국실과교육학회
- 조승호, "중고등교육과 공학기술", 공학교육, 9(2), pp.26~28 (2002)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks of scientific literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Barron, B. J., "Doing with understanding : Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3), pp.271~311 (1998)
- Baumgartner, E., "Inquiry through design: Situating and supporting inquiry through design projects in high school science classroom", Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (1997)
- Baumgartner, E., "Designing inquiry: contextualizing teaching strategies in inquiry-based classrooms", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (1999)
- Benenson, G., "The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for learning", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), pp.730~745 (2001)
- Bloch, E., "National Research Council. The New Engineering Research Centers : Purposes, goals, and expectations" (1996), National Academic Press
- Brochway, D., "Engineering connections for middle school science teachers" (2008), American Society for Engineering Education Mid-Atlantic
- Cajas, F., "The science", technology interaction: Implications for science literacy, 2001, pp.38(7), 715~729
- Cobb, P., "Design experiments in educational research", Educational Researcher, 32(1), pp.9~13 (2003)
- Collins, A., "Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), pp.15~42 (2004)
- Constantinou, C., "Students' epistemological awareness concerning the distinction between science and technology", International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), pp.143~172 (2010)
- Crismond, D., "Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate and redesign task: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), pp.791~820 (2001)
- Edelson, D. C., "Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), pp.355~385 (2001)
- Europe needs more scientists. Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe, "European Commission", Josee Mariano Gago, ~ (2004)
- Gall, M. D., "Educational research (7th ed.)" (2003), Allyn and Bacon
- Hart, C., "What is the purpose of this experiment? Or Can students learn something from doing experiment?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), pp.655~675 (2000)
- Hodson, D., "Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change", International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), pp.755~760 (1996)
- Hofstein, A., "The laboratory in science education: Foundation for the twenty-first century", Science Education, 88(1), pp.28~54 (2004)
- International Technology Education Association, "Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology" (2000), International Technology Education Association. National Academy Press
- Kanter, D. E., "Doing the project and learning the content: designing project-based science curricula for meaningful understanding", Science Education, 94(3), pp.525~551 (2010)
- Keys, C. W., "Understanding inquiry science teaching in context-A case study of elementary teacher", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(4), pp.315~333 (1999)
- Kolodner, J. L., "Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons from an inquiry into science education", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), pp.9~49 (2002)
- Krajcik, J. S., "Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy", Science Education, 92(1), pp.1~32 (2008)
- Lee, K. W. L., "Science teachers and problem solving in elementary schools in Singapore", Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), pp.113~26 (2000)
- Lewis, T., "Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), pp.255~281 (2006)
- Martens, M. L., "Inhibitors to implementing a problem- solving approach to teaching elementary science-case study of a teacher in change", School Science and Mathematics, 92, pp.150~156 (1992)
- Marx, R. W., "Enacting project-based science", The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), pp.341~358 (1997)
- Marx, R. W., "Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.1063~1080 (2004)
- National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- Rivet, A., "Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), pp.669~692 (2004)
- Rohaan, E. J., "Reviewing the relations between teachers knowledge and pupils attitude in the field of primary technology education", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, pp.15~26 (2010)
- Roth, W. M., "Learning science through technological design", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), pp.768~790 (2001)
- Schank, R. C., "The design of goal-based scenarios", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, pp.305~346 (1994)
- Schauble, L., "Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), pp.850~882 (1991)
- Seiler, G., "Design, technology, and science: Sites for learning, resistance and social reproduction in urban schools", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), pp.746~767 (2001)
- Vincenti, W. G., "What engineers know and how they know it" (1990), John Hopkins University Press
- Wilkinson, J. W., "The purpose and perceived effectiveness of laboratories work in secondary school", Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(2), pp.49~55 (1997)
- Williams, W. M., "Thinking like a scientist about real-world problems: The Cornell Institute for Research on Children Science Education Program", Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, pp.107~126 (2004)