본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등 과학 수업에서 나타나는 교사의 발문에 대한 인식과 실제 수업 분석

조민정|여상인|최취임
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)|2012.02|초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)|제31권 제1호|pp. 57-70

2

조회

0

다운로드

26

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

elementary science classteacher's questioningteacher's perception of question
주제분류교육학

초록

We investigated the perception and preferred type of question and analyzed type of questions asked by teachers in elementary science class to identify how teachers' perception of questioning is reflected in teaching practices. We collected the data from questionnaires, deep-interview and audiotaped four classes from grade 3 and six classes from grade 6. The data form deep-interview were analyzed interpretively and Blosser' framework of question was used to analyze questions which teachers used in classes. By interpretation of data from questionnaires, the teachers agreed that questioning affects science class in elementary school. There were a little differences in perceptions of questioning among three teachers. They preferred various types of question rather than a specific type. They didn't have a good understanding of questioning. The result showed that the teachers used frequently cognitive-memory question and convergent thinking question, which belonged to closed questions in their science classes. This didn't accord with their preferred types of question. The causes came from objectives of science instruction, degree of understanding about questioning, preference and confidence for science class. From this findings, we suggested that teachers should be given opportunities to take training courses in questioning in order to use effective questioning in science class

Abstract

We investigated the perception and preferred type of question and analyzed type of questions asked by teachers in elementary science class to identify how teachers' perception of questioning is reflected in teaching practices. We collected the data from questionnaires, deep-interview and audiotaped four classes from grade 3 and six classes from grade 6. The data form deep-interview were analyzed interpretively and Blosser' framework of question was used to analyze questions which teachers used in classes. By interpretation of data from questionnaires, the teachers agreed that questioning affects science class in elementary school. There were a little differences in perceptions of questioning among three teachers. They preferred various types of question rather than a specific type. They didn't have a good understanding of questioning. The result showed that the teachers used frequently cognitive-memory question and convergent thinking question, which belonged to closed questions in their science classes. This didn't accord with their preferred types of question. The causes came from objectives of science instruction, degree of understanding about questioning, preference and confidence for science class. From this findings, we suggested that teachers should be given opportunities to take training courses in questioning in order to use effective questioning in science class

참고문헌 (65)

  1. 권낙원, "인지양식에 따른 발문유형별 학습 효과", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 3(6), pp.171~190 (2003), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  2. 권순희, "초등학교 국어과 수업에 나타난 교사의 질문, 피드백 양상과 개선 방안", 국어교육, (118), pp.65~100 (2005), 한국어교육학회
  3. 길양숙, "교사의 질문행동의 특성과 관련 변인의 탐색", 교육학연구, 33(1), pp.27~44 (1995)
  4. 金永官, "교사의 發問選好와 發問行動과의 관계", 석사, pp.1994
  5. 김용국, "사고력 신장을 위한 발문에 관한 고찰", 초등교육학연구, 1(1), pp.23~43 (1993)
  6. 문태식, "초등 과학 수업에서 교사들의 발문 행동 분석", 석사, pp.2001
  7. 박병학, "발문법 원론" (1986), 세광출판사
  8. 박수경, "과학영재학교 교수활동에 관한 학생인식 및 과학수업에서 상호작용 유형", 한국지구과학회지, 26(1), pp.30~40 (2005), 한국지구과학회
  9. 朴丁順, "初等學校 學習者의 認知樣式에 따른 發問水準이 學業成就에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.1991
  10. 박종윤, "중학교 과학 수업에서 질문과 피드백을 활용한 교사-학생 상호작용 강화 수업 전략의 개발 및 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(2), pp.239~245 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
  11. 복길연, "초등 과학 수업에서의 교사의 발문 유형 및 학생 응답 분석에 관한 사례 연구", 석사, pp.2009
  12. 송용의, "효율적인 교사의 발문 기법" (1994), 배영사
  13. 유현경, "과학수업에서 교사의 질문방식이 학생들의 학업성취와 태도 및 교사-학생 상호작용에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2006
  14. 尹知重, "初等敎師의 發問 水準이 兒童의 批判的 思考力에 미치는 影響", 석사, 초등교육학, pp.1993
  15. 이명숙, "질적 심층면담의 신빙성: 그 내적 기제에 관하여", 교육학논총, 24(2), pp.127~139 (2003)
  16. 임선빈, "교사의 인지적 발문이 학업 성취에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ", 교육연구, 14, pp.141~162 (1996)
  17. 임희준, "초등 예비 교사들의 일반 교수 효능감과 과학 교수 효능감 비교", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.131~139 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
  18. 정민수, "과학영재 수업에서 교사의 발문과 피드백 실태분석-서울대 과학영재교육센터 수업사례 관찰-", 한국과학교육학회지, 27(9), pp.666~678 (2007), 한국과학교육학회
  19. 鄭雨貞, "부분구조를 이용한 유사동적실험기법", 석사, pp.1993
  20. 조연순, "초등 과학 수업에서 교사의 발문과 반응 유형 분석-사고력 신장의 측면에서-", 교육과학연구, 27(1), pp.51~69 (1998), 교육과학연구소
  21. 趙在勳, "학습자의 인지발달 수준에 따른 발문유형이 학업성취에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.1996
  22. 최경희, "중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1039~1048 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  23. 崔秀吉, "초인지 유형에 따른 발문수준 적용이 창의성 신장에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.1996
  24. Black, P., "Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education: Principles", Policy & Practice, 5(1), pp.7~74 (1998)
  25. Blosser, P. E., "Ask the right questions" (2000), NSTA press
  26. 설양환, "효과적인 교수법" (2006), 아카데미프레스
  27. Brophy, J., "Teacher behavior and student achievement, In Handbook of research on teaching", pp.328~375 (1986), Macmillan
  28. Callahan, J. F., "Teaching in the middle and secondary schools(6th Ed)" (1998), Merrill
  29. Callahan, J. F., "Teaching in the middle and secondary schools. 6th" (1998), Merrill
  30. Carlsen, W. S., "Teacher knowledge and discourse control : Quantitative evidence from novice teachers' classrooms", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), pp.471~481 (1993)
  31. Cassidy, D. J., "Questioning the young child : Processes and function", Childhood Education, 63(3), pp.146~149 (1989)
  32. Chin, C., "Teacher questioning in science classrooms : approaches that stimulate productive thinking", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), pp.815~843 (2007)
  33. Cliatt, M, J. P., "Effects of training on the divergent thinking abilityies of kindergarten children", Child Development, 51(4), pp.1061~1064 (1980)
  34. Cole, P. G., "수업의 원리와 실제" (1994), 성원사
  35. Davis, B. G., "Tools for teaching" (1993), Jossey-Bass Inc
  36. Davis, K. S., "Change is hard : What science teachers ar telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practics", Science Education, 87(1), pp.3~30 (2003)
  37. Deture, L. R., "The science preparation of elementary teachers", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (1990)
  38. Dillon, J. T., "The effect of questions in education and other enterprises", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14(2), pp.127~152 (1982)
  39. Dillon, J. T., "Using questions to foil discussion", Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(2), pp.109~121 (1985)
  40. Dillon, J. T., "Questioning and teaching : A manual of practice", pp.45~71 (1988), Croom Helm
  41. Dillon, J. T., "The remedial status of student questioning", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), pp.197~210 (1988)
  42. Duit, R., "Learning in science: From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond, In International handbook of science education", pp.3~25 (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  43. Productive thinking of gifted children, "Gallagher, J. J.", University of Illinois, ~, pp.Cooperative Research Project No. 965 (1965)
  44. Harlen, W., "Primary teachers' understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching", International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), pp.93~105 (1997)
  45. Hyman, R. T., "Discussion strategies and tactics, In Question, questioning techniques, and effective teaching", pp.23~48 (1987), National Education Association
  46. Lemke, J. L., "Talking science: Language, learning and values" (1990), Ablex
  47. Mehan, H., "Learning lessons" (1979), Harvard University Press
  48. Montague, E. J., "Fundamentals of secondary classroom instruction" (1987), Merrill Pub. Co
  49. Mortimer, E. F., "Meaning making in secondary science classrooms" (2003), Open University Press
  50. Redfield, D., "A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behaviour", Review of Educational Research, 51(2), pp.237~246 (1981)
  51. Roth, W-M., "Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment : Interactions of context, content, and student responses", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), pp.709~736 (1996)
  52. Rowe, M. B., "Wait time : Slowing down may be a way of speeding up!", Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), pp.43~50 (1986)
  53. Samson, G. E., "The effects of teacher questioning levels on student achievement: A quantitative synthesis", Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), pp.290~295 (1987)
  54. Seidman, I., "Interviewing as qualitative research" (1998), Teachers College Press
  55. Shrigley, R. L., "Attitude and behavior are correlates", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(1), pp.97~113 (1990)
  56. Smith, E. L., "Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), pp.111~126 (1993)
  57. Tilgner, P. J., "Avoiding science in the elementary school", Science Education, 74(4), pp.421~431 (1990)
  58. Tobin, K., "The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning", Review of Educational Research, 57(1), pp.69~95 (1987)
  59. Tunstall, P., "‘How does your teacher help you to make your work better?' Children's understanding of formative assessment", The Curriculum Journal, 7(2), pp.185~203 (1996)
  60. Watter, J. J., "Enhancing preservice teachers education students' sense of science teaching self-efficacy", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Teacher Education association (1994)
  61. Wellington, J., "Talk of the classroom: Language interactions between teachers and pupils, In Language and literacy in science education", pp.24~40 (2001), Open University Press
  62. Wilen, W. W., "The Preferences of American History Students for the Cognitive Levels of Teachers' Verbal Questioning Behavior and the Relationship of Preferences to Achievement", American Education Research Association Annual Meeting (1977)
  63. Wilen, W. W., "Questioning skill for teacher" (1991), National Education Association
  64. Winne, P. H., "Experiments relating teachers’ use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement", Review of Educational Research, 49(1), pp.13~50 (1979)
  65. Young, B., "Science attitude and preparation of preservice elementary teachers", Science Education, 77(3), pp.279~291 (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

초등학교 과학수업에서 사용된 교사의 과학적 질문유형 분석이상균대한지구과학교육학회 · 대한지구과학교육학회지2012 · 제5권 제3호초등학교 과학과 교수·학습 과정에 따른 발문 유형 분석이상균대한지구과학교육학회 · 대한지구과학교육학회지2014 · 제7권 제2호과학 수업 시연에 나타난초등학교 예비교사들의 발문 유형 분석전영석초등교육연구원 · 한국초등교육2021 · 제32권 제2호중학교 과학교사의 발문 유형에 따른 발문 계획 및 활용 실태 조사김민환, 김성훈, 노태희, 이예진대한화학회 · 대한화학회지2024 · 제68권 제5호2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 5, 6학년 초등과학과 교사용 지도서에 제시된 발문 유형 분석김경아, 이형철한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2016 · 제35권 제1호담화맥락을 고려한 과학교사의 발문 활용에서 나타나는 특징과 발문 활용에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색김성훈, 노태희, 임준빈한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2024 · 제44권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

Bloom의 신 교육목표분류학에 따른 슬기로운 생활 교과의 수업 목표 분석신명경, 최취임, 이은영pp. 1-12과학 문제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생의 논증 특징임혜진, 여상인pp. 13-24초등학생의 과학 글쓰기 수행 안내를 위한 편지글 유형의 루브릭 개발 및 적용백성혜, 천재순, 정진수, 손진순pp. 25-39자유 탐구에서 과학 탐구 노트를 활용한 ASI 모듈 개발 및 적용 효과-지구와 우주 영역을 중심으로-이상균, 김순식, 최성봉pp. 40-56'먹이 그물과 먹이 피라미드’ 모형 구성에서 나타난 초등학생의 추론 유형김희백, 한문현pp. 71-83
원문 보기