초등 과학교과서 천문 내용에 대한 예비교사들의 질문의 배경지식 유형과 출처 분석
An Analysis of Types and Sources of Background Knowledges of Elementary Preservice Teachers' Questions about Astronomy Contents in Elementary Science Text Books
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between types and sources of background knowledges of elementary preteachers' questions about astronomy contents in the elementary science text books. Data were extracted from the preteachers' classes established in a university of education. The results are as follows. First, right background knowledges of questions were found in about 58% questions, wrong background knowledges 15%, and no background knowledges 26%. Second, it was found that ‘school’ as a source of background knowledges was found in 29% questions, ‘friend’ 21%, ‘internet’ 14%, ‘book reading’ 12%, ‘others’ 9%, ‘TV’ 7%, ‘institute’ 4%. In case of the type that right background knowledges have casual relation or correlation with question contents, ‘book reading’ and ‘TV’ sources rate increased, but ‘internet’ and ‘others’ decreased when compared to total questions. In the type which background knowledges are right and did not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, ‘internet’ source rate increased and ‘friend’ decreased. In case of the type that wrong background knowledges do not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, ‘friend’ and ‘TV’ sources rate increased, but ‘school’ and ‘book reading’ decreased. The type which background knowledges are right and did not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, ‘internet’ source rate increased and ‘friend’ decreased. In case of the type of no background knowledges, ‘TV’ and ‘institute’ source rate increased, but ‘internet’ and ‘book reading’ decreased. Third, the questions in ‘Earth and Moon’ unit have little background knowledges. The questions in ‘solar system and stars’ have background knowledges with no relation to the questions. Especially, in the unit ‘changes of seasons’, right background knowledges were found in more than half questions, but the contents of questions and background knowledges were not connected scientifically.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between types and sources of background knowledges of elementary preteachers' questions about astronomy contents in the elementary science text books. Data were extracted from the preteachers' classes established in a university of education. The results are as follows. First, right background knowledges of questions were found in about 58% questions, wrong background knowledges 15%, and no background knowledges 26%. Second, it was found that ‘school’ as a source of background knowledges was found in 29% questions, ‘friend’ 21%, ‘internet’ 14%, ‘book reading’ 12%, ‘others’ 9%, ‘TV’ 7%, ‘institute’ 4%. In case of the type that right background knowledges have casual relation or correlation with question contents, ‘book reading’ and ‘TV’ sources rate increased, but ‘internet’ and ‘others’ decreased when compared to total questions. In the type which background knowledges are right and did not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, ‘internet’ source rate increased and ‘friend’ decreased. In case of the type that wrong background knowledges do not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, ‘friend’ and ‘TV’ sources rate increased, but ‘school’ and ‘book reading’ decreased. The type which background knowledges are right and did not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, ‘internet’ source rate increased and ‘friend’ decreased. In case of the type of no background knowledges, ‘TV’ and ‘institute’ source rate increased, but ‘internet’ and ‘book reading’ decreased. Third, the questions in ‘Earth and Moon’ unit have little background knowledges. The questions in ‘solar system and stars’ have background knowledges with no relation to the questions. Especially, in the unit ‘changes of seasons’, right background knowledges were found in more than half questions, but the contents of questions and background knowledges were not connected scientifically.
참고문헌 (12)
- Brown, A. L, "Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities", American Psychologist, 41(10), pp.1056~1068 (1986)
- 최경희, "중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1039~1048 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 노태희, "중학교 과학 수업에서 학생 질문을 촉진하는 방안으로서의주단위 보고서의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), pp.385~392 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- Lee, G, "Where cognitive conflict arises from?: The structure of creating cognitive conflict", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), pp.601~623 (2013)
- 이명제, "초등 과학교과서 지구과학 지식에 대한 예비교사들의 질문 종류, 빈도 및 인지적 배경 출처 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 35(4), pp.277~289 (2014), 한국지구과학회
- 이명제, "초등 과학교과서 내용에 대한 예비교사들의 주요 질문에 나타나는 용어의 상호 관련성 수준과 유형", 한국지구과학회지, 27(1), pp.20~31 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- Matthews, M. R, "Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues" (2000), The University of Chicago Press
- 오필석, "지구과학의 한 탐구 방법으로서 귀추법에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(5), pp.610~623 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
- 박종윤, "중학교 과학 수업에서 질문과 피드백을 활용한 교사-학생 상호작용 강화 수업 전략의 개발 및 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(2), pp.239~245 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 류재인, "초등학교 3~6학년 과학교과서의 질문방략 분석", 초등과학교육, 25(2), pp.109~117 (2006), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Wood, T, "Constructivism in education", pp.331~349 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
- 임인성, "한국천문연구원 질문상자의 통계 및 과학탐구 질문유형 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 26(6), pp.551~524 (2005), 한국지구과학회
