본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학 공학적 실천에 의한 초등학교 과학 교과서 물질 영역의 탐구 활동 분석

The Analysis of Inquiry Activity in the Material Domain of the Elementary Science Textbook by Science and Engineering Practices

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

We examined the inquiry activities in the material domain of the elementary science textbooks and experimental workbooks based on 2009 revised curriculum. The analysis framework was SEP (Science and Engineering Practices) - ‘Asking questions and defining problems’, ‘developing and using models’, ‘planning and carrying out investigations’, ‘analyzing and interpreting data’, ‘using mathematics and computational thinking’, ‘constructing explanations and designing solutions’, ‘engaging in argument from evidence’, and ‘obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’. Sub-SEP of each grade band were also used. The results showed that the 3rd~5th grade science textbooks and workbooks mainly emphasized ‘make observations and/or measurements’, ‘represent data in tables and/or various graphical displays’, or ‘use evidence to construct or support an explanation or design a solution to a problem’ among around 40 sub-SEP. In the case of the inquiry activities for 6th grade, majority of sub-SEP included were also only ‘collect data to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence to answer scientific questions or test design solutions’, ‘analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for phenomena’ or ‘construct a scientific explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from sources’. The type of ‘asking questions and defining problems’, ‘using mathematics and computational thinking’ or ‘obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’ were little found out of 8 SEP. Educational implications were discussed.

Abstract

We examined the inquiry activities in the material domain of the elementary science textbooks and experimental workbooks based on 2009 revised curriculum. The analysis framework was SEP (Science and Engineering Practices) - ‘Asking questions and defining problems’, ‘developing and using models’, ‘planning and carrying out investigations’, ‘analyzing and interpreting data’, ‘using mathematics and computational thinking’, ‘constructing explanations and designing solutions’, ‘engaging in argument from evidence’, and ‘obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’. Sub-SEP of each grade band were also used. The results showed that the 3rd~5th grade science textbooks and workbooks mainly emphasized ‘make observations and/or measurements’, ‘represent data in tables and/or various graphical displays’, or ‘use evidence to construct or support an explanation or design a solution to a problem’ among around 40 sub-SEP. In the case of the inquiry activities for 6th grade, majority of sub-SEP included were also only ‘collect data to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence to answer scientific questions or test design solutions’, ‘analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for phenomena’ or ‘construct a scientific explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from sources’. The type of ‘asking questions and defining problems’, ‘using mathematics and computational thinking’ or ‘obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’ were little found out of 8 SEP. Educational implications were discussed.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F, "Inquiry in science education : International perspectives", Science Education, 88(3), pp.397~419 (2004)
  2. Anderson, R. D, "Reforming science teaching : What research says about inquiry", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), pp.1~12 (2002)
  3. Asay, L. D, "Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in The Science Teacher, 1998-2007", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), pp.57~79 (2010)
  4. 조현준, "초등학교 과학 탐구 수업 실행의 저해 요인에 대한 교사들의 인식 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), pp.901~921 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
  5. Dewey, J, "Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education" (1916), The Macmillan Company
  6. Ireland, J, "Approaches to inquiry teaching: Elementary teacher’s perspectives", International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), pp.1733~1750 (2014)
  7. 전성수, "초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력과 과학 탐구능력, 논리적 사고력, 학업 성취도 수준과의 관계 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(7), pp.647~655 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  8. Jeon, Y, "An analysis of inquiry activities in high school chemistry Ⅱ textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum: 8 Practices of science", master, pp.2015
  9. 강남화, "2009 개정 과학교육과정에 따른 고등학교 물리 교과서 탐구활동 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), pp.132~143 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
  10. 김지영, "2009 개정 교육과정 화학Ⅱ 교과서의 탐구 활동 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(5), pp.928~937 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
  11. Kim, Y. S, "Analysis of scientific and engineering practices within STEAM programs in Korea", master, pp.2015
  12. Krajcik, J, "Project based science", The Science Teacher, 8(1), pp.25~27 (2015)
  13. 임성만, "우리나라 역대 초등학교 교과서에서 다루어진 ‘지구과학’ 영역의 중심개념과 탐구활동 분석 및 차기 교과서 개선 방안 모색", 초등과학교육, 34(3), pp.288~296 (2015), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  14. Lotter, C, "The influence of repeated teaching and reflection on preservice teachers’ views of inquiry and nature of science", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, pp.553~582 (2009)
  15. Lucero, M, "Teachers' beliefs and self-reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary schools", International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), pp.1407~1423 (2013)
  16. Martin-Hansen, L, "Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom", The Science Teacher, 69(2), pp.34~37 (2002)
  17. McNeill, K. L, "Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), pp.793~823 (2011)
  18. "Science curriculum" (2015)[URL]
  19. "Ministry of Education and Science Technology" (2012)[URL]
  20. "The American Book Company", 1894
  21. The National Academies Press, , 2012
  22. NGSS Lead States, "Next generation science standards: For states, by states" (2013), The National Academies Press
  23. Schwab, J. J, "The teaching of science", pp.1~103 (1962), Havard University Press
  24. Stroupe, D, "Describing “Science Practice” in learning settings", Science Education, 99(6), pp.1033~1040 (2015)
  25. Wargo, B. M, "Incorporating science and engineering practices into preservice secondary science teachers’ planning practices: Testing the efficacy of an intervention", Doctor, pp.2014
  26. Zhai, J, "Am I like a scientist?’: Primary children’s images of doing science in school", International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), pp.553~576 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)