다차원적 관점에서의 참여에 기초한 초등과학 수업 참여의 잠재집단 분석 및 차이 탐색
Latent Class Analysis and Difference Investigation of Elementary Students’ Multidimensional Engagement in Science Classes
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Students’ engagement is very important for effect science learning. Multidimensional approaches on students’ engagement defines engagement in three ways which includes cognitive, behavioral, and cognitive engagement. Based on the multidimensional approaches on students’ engagement, this study identified latent groups of elementary students characterized by patterns of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement in science classes. This study also compared students’ perceptions of their engagement in general science classes and small-group activities by the latent groups. 377 elementary students were involved in this study. 5-scale Likert survey were used in order to investigate students’ engagement in science classes. Latent class analysis using Mplus program identified 3 latent groups of students engagement in science classes: Highly engaged, moderately engaged, and minimally engaged in three ways of engagement. The mean scores of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement were significantly different by three latent groups. In addition, there were significant difference in students perceptions on participating experiments activities and carefully listening of teacher among latent groups. However, there was no significant difference in students’ perceptions on their actions during small-group activities. Educational implications were discussed.
Abstract
Students’ engagement is very important for effect science learning. Multidimensional approaches on students’ engagement defines engagement in three ways which includes cognitive, behavioral, and cognitive engagement. Based on the multidimensional approaches on students’ engagement, this study identified latent groups of elementary students characterized by patterns of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement in science classes. This study also compared students’ perceptions of their engagement in general science classes and small-group activities by the latent groups. 377 elementary students were involved in this study. 5-scale Likert survey were used in order to investigate students’ engagement in science classes. Latent class analysis using Mplus program identified 3 latent groups of students engagement in science classes: Highly engaged, moderately engaged, and minimally engaged in three ways of engagement. The mean scores of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement were significantly different by three latent groups. In addition, there were significant difference in students perceptions on participating experiments activities and carefully listening of teacher among latent groups. However, there was no significant difference in students’ perceptions on their actions during small-group activities. Educational implications were discussed.
참고문헌 (26)
- 교육부, "과학과 교육과정", 교육부 고시 제2015-74호, 별책 9, ~ (2015)
- 학생 참여형 과학수업 선도학교 지원 연구단 사업보고서, "김용진", 한국과학창의재단, ~, pp.BD18040002 (2018)
- 김현경, "과학고 토론수업을 위한 수업모형 개발과 적용과정에서 나타난 언어적 상호작용의 특징", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(4), pp.359~372 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 남정희, "멘토링을 통한 초임중등과학교사의 수업에서의교사․학생 상호작용 변화 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(8), pp.953~970 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- 박종윤, "중학교 과학 수업에서 질문과 피드백을 활용한 교사-학생 상호작용 강화 수업 전략의 개발 및 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(2), pp.239~245 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 유신복, "중학생의 수업참여 잠재 프로파일 분류 및 영향요인 탐색", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(23), pp.517~539 (2017), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- 유은정, "중등 과학 수업의 참여구조 사례 연구: ‘혼성적 의미 창출 공간’의 형성 가능성 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), pp.603~617 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- 이혜정, "초등학교 6학년 과학 수업의 사회적 참여구조 유형", 초등과학교육, 24(2), pp.123~129 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 최준영, "과학수업에서 나타나는 중학생 행동의 정량적 분석 : 참여와 침묵을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2015
- 최준영, "과학수업에서 나타나는 학생들의 행동적 참여 분석을 위한 영상 분석 도구의 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(2), pp.247~258 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Ainley, M., "Styles of engagement with learning : Multidimensional assessment of their relationships with strategy use and school achievement", Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), pp.395~405 (1993)
- Birch, S. H., "The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment", Journal of School Psychology, 35, pp.61~79 (1997)
- Blumenfeld, P., "Developmental pathway through middle childhood: Rethinking contexts and diversity as resources" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Brophy, J. E., "Advances in motivation and achievement: Enhancing motivation", pp.181~210 (1987), JAI Press
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Flow: The psychology of optimal experience" (1990), Harper & Row
- Finn, J., "School characteristics related to student engagement", Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), pp.249~268 (1993)
- Fredricks, J. A., "School engagement : Potential of the concept, state of the evidence", Review of Educational Research, 74(1), pp.59~109 (2004)
- 김진현, "Mplus를 이용한 데이터 분석" (2019), 학지사
- Guthrie, J. T., "Handbook of reading research" (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Harris, L. R., "A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning", The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), pp.57~79 (2008)
- Hart, S., "The student engagement in schools questionnaire(SESQ)and the teacher engagement report form-new(TERF-N) : Examining the preliminary evidence", Contemporary School Psychology, 15, pp.67~79 (2011)
- Lim, H., "Elementary students’ and teachers’ perceptions on science class engagement", The 7th International Conference for Network for Inter-Asian Chemistry Educators (2018)
- McKinney, J. D., "Relationship between classroom behaviour and academic achievement", Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), pp.198~203 (1975)
- Miller, R. B., "Engagement in academic work : The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others and perceived ability", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, pp.388~422 (1996)
- Natriello, G., "Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools", Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, pp.14~24 (1984)
- Wang, M. T., "Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles", Developmental Psychology, 49(7), pp.1266~1276 (2013)