A Study of Customer Responses to Service Failure andRecovery: The Role of the Service Provider’s Recovery Effortand Customer-Employee Rapport
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigated the effect of the service provider’s recovery effort and pre-failure customer-employee rapport on post-recovery consumer response such as satisfaction, purchase intention, and positive word-of-mouth communication. First, this study explored the interaction effect of recovery effort and customer-employee rapport on post-recovery consumer response. The result shows that when the level of pre-failure customer-employee rapport is high, customer positive responses decreased slightly even though they perceived a low recovery effort. However, when the level of pre-failure customer-employee rapport is low, customer responses were decreased considerably in case of low recovery effort. Second, this study examined the ‘service recovery paradox’ which is post-recovery consumer satisfaction which is greater than the case of no service failure. The result shows a recovery paradox was not supported in all samples regardless of the level of recovery effort and customer-employee rapport. Synthetically, customer-employee rapport took a buffering role in customer response after service failure although it's not the same as an error-free state.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of the service provider’s recovery effort and pre-failure customer-employee rapport on post-recovery consumer response such as satisfaction, purchase intention, and positive word-of-mouth communication. First, this study explored the interaction effect of recovery effort and customer-employee rapport on post-recovery consumer response. The result shows that when the level of pre-failure customer-employee rapport is high, customer positive responses decreased slightly even though they perceived a low recovery effort. However, when the level of pre-failure customer-employee rapport is low, customer responses were decreased considerably in case of low recovery effort. Second, this study examined the ‘service recovery paradox’ which is post-recovery consumer satisfaction which is greater than the case of no service failure. The result shows a recovery paradox was not supported in all samples regardless of the level of recovery effort and customer-employee rapport. Synthetically, customer-employee rapport took a buffering role in customer response after service failure although it's not the same as an error-free state.
참고문헌 (7)
- Anderson, "The Efect of Disconfirmed Ex- pectancy on Perceived Product Perfor- mance Journal of Marketing Research", pp.38~44 (1973)
- Beatty, Sharon E, "Customer-Sales Associate Retail Relationships", 72, pp.223~247 (1996)
- Bery, "Competing Through Quality" (1991), The Free Press
- Bitner, "The Effects of Physical Sur- roundings and Employe Responses Journal of Marketing", pp.69~82 (1990)
- Bernard H, "Journal of Marketing", pp.71~84 (1990), Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable In- cidents
- Blodgett, Jefrey. G, "The Efects of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Postcomplaint Behavior", 73(2), pp.185~210 (1997)
- Bolton, "A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Atitudes Journal of Marketing", pp.1~10 (1991)
