본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effect of Regulatory Focus and Product Type on the Difference in Acceptable Prices between Buyers and Sellers

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

This study examines the generalizability of existing research relating to an online auction situation, which suggests a gap exists between a buyer's willing-to-pay price (WTP) and a seller's willing-to-sell price (WTS) concerning the same product, due to the endowment effect and consumers' propensity for loss aversion. At the same time, this study also identifies and examines potential moderating factors for the effect such as product type and consumer's goal orientation based on existing theories about consumers' gain-loss heuristics. The results show that WTS is consistently higher than WTP, and that such a gap gets more pronounced when the target product is hedonic vs. utilitarian and when consumers have prevention goals vs. promotion goals. Lastly, limitations and managerial implications of this study are discussed.

Abstract

This study examines the generalizability of existing research relating to an online auction situation, which suggests a gap exists between a buyer's willing-to-pay price (WTP) and a seller's willing-to-sell price (WTS) concerning the same product, due to the endowment effect and consumers' propensity for loss aversion. At the same time, this study also identifies and examines potential moderating factors for the effect such as product type and consumer's goal orientation based on existing theories about consumers' gain-loss heuristics. The results show that WTS is consistently higher than WTP, and that such a gap gets more pronounced when the target product is hedonic vs. utilitarian and when consumers have prevention goals vs. promotion goals. Lastly, limitations and managerial implications of this study are discussed.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Bar-Hillel, Maya, "Why Are People Reluctant to Exchange Lottery Tickets?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, pp.17~27 (1996)
  2. Bohm, Gisela, "Instrumental or Emotional Evaluations: What Determines Preferences?", Acta Psychologica, 93(1-3), pp.135~148 (1996)
  3. Carmon, Ziv, "Focusing on the Foregone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyer and Sellers", Journal of Consumer Research, 27, pp.360~370 (2000)
  4. Dhar, Ravi, "Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods", Journal of Marketing Research, 37, pp.60~71 (2000)
  5. Heberlein, Thomas A., "Assessing the Validity of Contingent Valuation:Three Filed Experiment", International Conference on Man's Role in Changing the Global Environment (1985)
  6. Higgins, E.Tory, "Beyond Pleasure and Pain", American Psychologist, 52, pp.1280~1300 (1997)
  7. Higgins, E.Tory, "Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle in Advances in Experimental Psychology Vol. 30", pp.1~46 (1998), Academic Press
  8. Hirschman, Elizabeth C., "Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions", Journal of Marketing, 46, pp.92~101 (1982)
  9. Kahneman, Daniel, "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk", Econometrica, 47, pp.263~291 (1979)
  10. Kahneman, Daniel, "Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem", Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), pp.1325~1348 (1990)
  11. Leclerc, Farnce, "Foreign Branding and Its Effects on Product Perceptions and Attitudes", Journal of Marketing Research, 31, pp.263~270 (1994)
  12. Lee, Hak-Sik, "Consumer Behavior 3rd ed" (2001), Bobmunsa
  13. Lockwood, Penelope, "Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models: Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire Us", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), pp.854~864 (2002)
  14. MacInnis, Deborah J., "The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions", Journal of Consumer Research, 13, pp.473~491 (1987)
  15. Na, June-Hee, "The Role of Consumer's Regulatory Focus on Postpurchase Regret", Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 5(1), pp.35~51 (2004)
  16. Pham, Michel Tuan, "Promotion and Prevention in Consumer Decision Making: State of the Art and Theoretical Propositions Inside consumption: Frontiers of research on consumer motives, goals, and desires", pp.8~43 (2005), Routledge
  17. Thaler, Richard H., "Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, pp.39~60 (1980)
  18. Simonson, Itarmar, "Anchoring Effects on Consumers' Willingnessto-pay and Willingness-to-Accept", Journal of Consumer Research, 31, pp.681~690 (2004)
  19. Strahilevitz, Michal A., "The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects", Journal of Consumer Research, 25, pp.276~289 (1998)
  20. Strahilevitz, Michal A., "Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell", Journal of Consumer Research, 24, pp.434~446 (1998)
  21. Tversky, Amos, "Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases", Science, 185, pp.1124~1131 (1974)
  22. Tversky, Amos, "Endowment and Contrast in Judgements of Well-Being in Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspectives", pp.101~118 (1991), Pergamon Press
  23. Tversky, Amos, "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice:A Reference-Dependent Model", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp.1039~1062 (1991)
  24. Yeo, Jun-Sang, "The Influence of Regulatory Focus on Brand Extension Evaluation", Spring Conference in Korea Consumption Culture Association, pp.95~108 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)