본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공동마케팅제휴에 있어 상호의존성과 갈등의 관계에 대한 연구

An Empirical Investigation of Relationship Between Interdependence and Conflict in Co-marketing Alliance

0

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Researchers in channel dyads have devoted much attention to relationship between interdependence (i.e. interdependence enymmetry and total interdependence) and conflict that promote channel performance. In social science, in spite of the inconsistent results in marketing practice, there are two contradictory theories explain the relationship between interdependence and conflict - bilateral deterrence theory and conflict spiral theory. The authors apply these theories to co-marketing alliance situation in terms that this relationship is also incorporated both company's dependence, either from one company's perspective or each partner about its respective dependence. Using survey data and archival data from 181 companies enlisted in a telecommunication membership program, the authors find out the relationship between interdependence and conflict as well as investigate the antecedents of interdependence - transaction age, transaction frequency, the numbers of alliance partner, and co-marketing alliance specific assets according to previous researches. Using PLS analysis, the authors demonstrate that, with increasing total interdependence in a telecommunication membership program, two co-marketing partners' conflict level is increased in accord with the author's conflict spiral theory predictions. As expected, higher interdependence asymmetry has negative value to level of conflict even though this result is not statistically significant. Other findings can be summarized as follows. In the perspective of telecommunication company, transaction age, transaction frequency, and co-marketing alliance specific assets have influence on its dependence on a partner as independent variables. To the contrary, in a partner's perspective, transaction frequency, co-marketing alliance specific assets and the numbers of alliance partner have significantly impact on its dependence on a telecommunication company. In direct effect analysis, it is shown that transaction age, frequency and co-marketing alliance specific assets have direct influence on conflict. This results suggest that it is more useful for a telecommunication company to select a co-marketing partner which is frequently used by customers and earned high rates of mileage. In addition, the results show that dependence of a telecommunication company on a co-marketing partner is more significantly effected to co-marketing alliance conflict than partner's one. It provide an effective conflict management strategy to a telecommunication company for controling customer's usage rate or having the co-marketing partner deposit high level of alliance specific investment (i.e. mileage). To a co-marketing partner of telecommunication company, it is required control the percentage of co-marketing sales in total sales revenue or seek various co-marketing partners in order for co-marketing conflict management. The research implications, limitation and future research of these results are discussed.

Abstract

Researchers in channel dyads have devoted much attention to relationship between interdependence (i.e. interdependence enymmetry and total interdependence) and conflict that promote channel performance. In social science, in spite of the inconsistent results in marketing practice, there are two contradictory theories explain the relationship between interdependence and conflict - bilateral deterrence theory and conflict spiral theory. The authors apply these theories to co-marketing alliance situation in terms that this relationship is also incorporated both company's dependence, either from one company's perspective or each partner about its respective dependence. Using survey data and archival data from 181 companies enlisted in a telecommunication membership program, the authors find out the relationship between interdependence and conflict as well as investigate the antecedents of interdependence - transaction age, transaction frequency, the numbers of alliance partner, and co-marketing alliance specific assets according to previous researches. Using PLS analysis, the authors demonstrate that, with increasing total interdependence in a telecommunication membership program, two co-marketing partners' conflict level is increased in accord with the author's conflict spiral theory predictions. As expected, higher interdependence asymmetry has negative value to level of conflict even though this result is not statistically significant. Other findings can be summarized as follows. In the perspective of telecommunication company, transaction age, transaction frequency, and co-marketing alliance specific assets have influence on its dependence on a partner as independent variables. To the contrary, in a partner's perspective, transaction frequency, co-marketing alliance specific assets and the numbers of alliance partner have significantly impact on its dependence on a telecommunication company. In direct effect analysis, it is shown that transaction age, frequency and co-marketing alliance specific assets have direct influence on conflict. This results suggest that it is more useful for a telecommunication company to select a co-marketing partner which is frequently used by customers and earned high rates of mileage. In addition, the results show that dependence of a telecommunication company on a co-marketing partner is more significantly effected to co-marketing alliance conflict than partner's one. It provide an effective conflict management strategy to a telecommunication company for controling customer's usage rate or having the co-marketing partner deposit high level of alliance specific investment (i.e. mileage). To a co-marketing partner of telecommunication company, it is required control the percentage of co-marketing sales in total sales revenue or seek various co-marketing partners in order for co-marketing conflict management. The research implications, limitation and future research of these results are discussed.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. 김영, "공동마케팅에서 전략적 제휴성과의 핵심선행요인에 관한 연구", 상품학연구, 24(2), pp.37~66 (2006), 한국상품학회
  2. 김영찬, "고객만족도 측정방법론과 전략적 활용", 마케팅연구, 18(1), pp.113~132 (2003), 한국마케팅학회
  3. 김문구, "이동통신서비스에서 전환장벽이 고객유지에 미치는 조절효과에 관한 실증연구", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 13(3), pp.107~130 (2003), 한국경영정보학회
  4. 김재욱, "상호의존성과 갈등 간 관계에 있어서상호의존성과 갈등 간 관계에 있어서 신뢰의 조절효과", 유통연구, 9(4), pp.43~63 (2004), 한국유통학회
  5. 김종근, "불균형적 상호의존성과 갈등간 비선형적 관계에 대한 연구", 유통연구, 10(2), pp.49~72 (2005), 한국유통학회
  6. 김희수, "국내 이동전화시장의 가입전환 및 고객충성도 결정요인 분석", 정보사회연 구, 2000(1), pp.1~18 (2000)
  7. 신영식, "제휴카드 할인프로그램이 외식업의 수익성에 미치는 영향", 아시아마케팅저널, 12(4), pp.55~78 (2011), 한국마케팅학회
  8. 이석규, "고객 보상프로그램의 효과성에 관한연구 : 신규 고객유치를 위한 전략적 프레임?", 아시아마케팅저널, 7(2), pp.123~139 (2005), 한국마케팅학회
  9. 이제홍, "이동통신 3사의 통신 서비스 품질에 관한 연구", e-비즈니스연구, 11(1), pp.507~527 (2010), 국제e-비즈니스학회
  10. 한상린, "산업재 시장에서 구매자-공급자 관계의 선행변수와 거래성과에 관한 연구", 유통연구, 8(1), pp.1~19 (2003), 한국유통학회
  11. Anderson, J. C, "A Model of the Distributor's Perspective of Distributor-Manufacturer Working Relationships", Journal of Marketing, 48(4), pp.62~ (1990)
  12. Bacharach, S. B, "Bargaining: Power, Tactics, and Outcomes" (1981), Jossey-Bass
  13. Brown, J. R., "Conflict and Power-Dependence Relations in Retailer-Supplier Channels", Journal of Retailing, 59(4), pp.53~ (1983)
  14. Buchanan,Lauranne, "Vertical Trade Relationship:The Role of Dependence and Symmetry in Attaining Organizational Goals", Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), pp.65~ (1992)
  15. Bucklin, Louis P, "Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliance", Journal of Marketing, 57, pp.32~ (1993)
  16. Chiou, J, "Service Quality,Trust,Specific Asset Investment,and Expertise:Direct and Indirect Effect in a Satisfaction-Loyalty Framework", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), pp.613~627 (2006)
  17. Coleman,P.T, "Power and conflict, In The Handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and Practice" (2000), Jossey-Bass
  18. Deutsch, M, "Studies of Interpersonal Bargaining", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6(1), pp.52~76 (1962)
  19. Efron,B, "Bootstrap methods:Another look at the Jackknife", The Annals of Statistics, 7(1), pp.1~26 (1979)
  20. Emerson,R.M, "Power-Dependence Relations", American Sociological Review, 27, pp.31~41 (1962)
  21. Frazier,Gary L, "Organizing and Managing Channels of Distributions", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), pp.226~240 (1999)
  22. Frazier, Gary L., "Dealer Dependence Levels and Reciprocal Actions in a Channel of Distribution in a Developing Country", Journal of Marketing, 53(1), pp.50~69 (1989)
  23. Frazier, Gary L., "The Use of Influence Strategies in Interfirm Relationships in Industrial Product Channels", Journal of Marketing, 55, pp.52~69 (1991)
  24. Fornell, C., "Two structural equation models:LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory", Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), pp.440~452 (1982)
  25. Fornell, C., "Assumption of the two-step approach to latent variable modeling", Sociological Methods and Research, 20(3), pp.291~320 (1992)
  26. Gates,Stephen, "Strategic Alliance: Guideline for Successful Management" (1993), The Conference Board Inc
  27. Gundlach, G. T, "Exchange Interdependence and Interfirm Interaction:Research in a Simulated Channel Setting", Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4), pp.516~532 (1994)
  28. Heide,Jan B, "Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels", Journal of Marketing, 58(1), pp.71~85 (1994)
  29. Heide, Jan B, "The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in Conventional Channels", Journal of Marketing, 52(1), pp.20~35 (1988)
  30. Heide, Jan B, "Alliances in Industrial Purchasing:The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships", Journal of Marketing Research, 27, pp.24~36 (1990)
  31. Kale, Prashant, "Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital", Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), pp.217~237 (2000)
  32. Kalwani, Manohar U, "Long-Term Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships:Do They Pay Off for Supplier Firms", Journal of Marketing, 59(1), pp.1~16 (1995)
  33. Kandemir, D., "Alliance Orientation:Conceptualizatioin,Measurement,and Impact on Market Performance", Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), pp.324~340 (2006)
  34. Kumar, N., "The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes", Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), pp.348~35 (1995)
  35. Lawler,E.J, "Bilateral Deterrence and Conflict Spiral: A Theoretical Analysis, In Advances in Group Processes", pp.107~130 (1986), JAI
  36. Lawler, E, J, "Comparison of dependence and punitive forms of power", Social Forces, 66(2), pp.446~462 (1987)
  37. Lawler, E. J., "Coercive Capability in Conflict:A Test of Bilateral Deterrence Versus Conflict Spiral Theory", Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), pp.93~107 (1988)
  38. Lorange, P, "Strategic Alliances" (1992), Blackwell
  39. McCann, Joseph E, "An Approach for Assessing and Managing Inter-Unit Interdependence", The Academy of Management, 4(1), pp.113~119 (1979)
  40. "Applying Conflict Theory to Strategy Selection in Scholarly Communication"[URL]
  41. Mitchell, Will, "Survival of Businesses Using Collaborative Relationships to Commercialize Complex Goods", Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), pp.169~195 (1996)
  42. Park. C. Whan, "Composite Brand Alliance:An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effect", Journal of Marketing Research, 33(4), pp.453~466 (1996)
  43. Parkhe,Arvind, "Strategic Alliance Structuring:A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation", Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), pp.794~829 (1993)
  44. Pfeffer, J, "The External Control of Organizations" (1978), Haper & Row Publisher, Inc
  45. Phillips,Lynn W, "Assessing Measurement Error in Key Information Reports:A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(4), pp.395~415 (1981)
  46. Podsakoff, P.M, "Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879~903 (2003)
  47. Porter, Michael. E., "Coalitions and Global Strategy" (1986), Harvard Business School Press
  48. Pruitt, Dean G., "Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement" (1986), Random House
  49. Rathneshwar, S., "Substitution in Use and the Role of Usage Context in Product Category Structures", Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), pp.281~295 (1991)
  50. Rich,Michael K, "Requirements for Successful Marketing Alliances", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(4), pp.447~456 (2003)
  51. "smartPLS 2.0"[URL]
  52. Rosenberg, Larry J., "Conflict Measurement in the Distribution Channel", Journal of Marketing Research, 8(4), pp.437~442 (1971)
  53. Spekman, Robert E., "Alliance Competence, Maximizing the Value of Your Partnerships" (2000), John Wiley & Sons
  54. Venkatesh, R., "Products with Branded Components:An Approach for Premium Pricing and Partner Selection", Marketing Science, 16(2), pp.146~165 (1997)
  55. 이호택, "An Empirical Investigation of Relational Conflicts in Co-Marketing Alliances", JOURNAL OF BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS MARKETING, 17(3), pp.249~278 (2010), HAWORTH PRESS INC

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)