본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

창의성센터 건립을 위한 학생, 교사 및 학부모의 인식 조사

A Survey Study of Perceptions for Students, Teachers and Parents Regarding Building Creativity Center

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to acquire a better of how creativity center is perceived among students, teachers and parents by administering a questionnaire. A total of 320 people participated in this survey. We developed the questionnaire which as categorized by four specific areas: 1) people's overall perceptions of creativity education; 2) the way of using the creativity center 3) programing of creativity center 4) space composition of the creativity center. The summary of survey results included; firstly, people had paid attention to creativity education and creativity education; secondly, they want to make use of creativity center with informal learning and extra-curriculum; thirdly, they prefer to participate in many experience activities such as camp or experiments;lastly, they more need creativity experience program and utilization of DIY education. In conclusion,students, teachers and parents recognized creativity center is needed. Therefore, more intensive research and follow-up study on building creativity center should be highly considered.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to acquire a better of how creativity center is perceived among students, teachers and parents by administering a questionnaire. A total of 320 people participated in this survey. We developed the questionnaire which as categorized by four specific areas: 1) people's overall perceptions of creativity education; 2) the way of using the creativity center 3) programing of creativity center 4) space composition of the creativity center. The summary of survey results included; firstly, people had paid attention to creativity education and creativity education; secondly, they want to make use of creativity center with informal learning and extra-curriculum; thirdly, they prefer to participate in many experience activities such as camp or experiments;lastly, they more need creativity experience program and utilization of DIY education. In conclusion,students, teachers and parents recognized creativity center is needed. Therefore, more intensive research and follow-up study on building creativity center should be highly considered.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 교육과학기술부, "2007 개정 교육과정 해설서", ~ (2009)
  2. 윤소현, "자연사박물관에서 활용 가능한 생물다양성 교육 프로그램의 개발과 적용", 박사, pp.2008
  3. 이선경, "자연사박물관의 전시에 반영된 과학의 본성", 한국지구과학회지, 26(5), pp.376~386 (2005), 한국지구과학회
  4. 이선경, "세계 주요 자연사 박물관의 교육 프로그램의 종류 및 특징", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), pp.357~374 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  5. 장현숙, "현장학습을 통한 중학생들의 과학관 선호도 및 인식 변화", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), pp.330~341 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
  6. 문성배, "교실 밖 화학체험학습에 대한 교사들의 인식-부산지역 중학교 과학교사를 대상으로-", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(7), pp.828~836 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
  7. 최지은, "자연사와 자연사 박물관에 대한 학생, 교사, 학부모들의 인식연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.869~885 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  8. 한문정, "과학관을 활용한 교수․학습에 대한 교사들의 인식과 교육 요구", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(8), pp.1060~1074 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
  9. Amabile, "How to kill creativity", Harvard Business Review, pp.76~87 (1998)
  10. Anderson, D., "Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), pp.177~199 (2003)
  11. Bell, P., "Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits" (2009), National Academies Press
  12. Gardner, H., "The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach" (1991), Basic Books
  13. Gardner, H., "Multiple intelligence: The theory an practice" (1993), Basic Books
  14. Holbrook, J., "The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy", International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), pp.1347~1362 (2007)
  15. Melber, L. M., "Science education in U. S. Natural history museums; A historical perspective", Science & Education, 11, pp.45~54 (2002)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)