본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Willingness to pay for eco-friendly products: case of cosmetics

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Environmental concern has been an important issue for a few decades, and the extent of consumer demand for eco-friendly consumption has been increased. This study seeks to investigate consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for eco-friendly cosmetics. This study evaluates how much more a consumer is willing to pay for eco-friendly cosmetics and examines significant factors influencing consumers’ WTP for eco-friendly cosmetics. Consumers’ WTP is measured using four different eco- friendly cosmetics: low-priced skin care cosmetics, low-priced makeup cosmetics, high-priced skin care cosmetics, and high-priced makeup cosmetics. This study uses the contingent valuation method (CVM) to estimate consumer’s WTP for eco-friendly cosmetics. Survey questions were designed using both dichotomous choice and payment card method of CVM. Through face to face interviews and on-line surveys, the data were collected from women between 20 and 49 years old residing in Seoul and Kyeonggi area, Korea, in May 2010. A total of 226 questionnaires (132 from interviews and 94 from on-line) were included for the analytical sample in this study. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, T-test and Log-Logit analysis. The findings are as follows:First, the WTP measured by dichotomous choice method was estimated using the Log-Logit analysis. The results showed that the estimated WTP for low-priced skin care cosmetics was 19,152 won, which was 27.7% higher than the reference price, 15,000 won. For low-priced makeup cosmetics, the estimated WTP was 18,524 won, and its green premium was 21.0%. The estimated WTP for high-priced skin care cosmetics was 59,128 won, which was 18.3% higher than the reference price, 50,000 won. For high-priced makeup cosmetics was 57,666 won, and its green premium was 15.3%. Second, the WTP measure by payment card method was estimated using descriptive analysis. The results showed that the respondents were willing to pay 17,955 won for low-priced skin care cosmetics, which was 19.7% higher than the reference price, 15,000 won and 17,595 won for low-priced makeup cosmetics, which was 17.3% higher than the reference price. For high-priced skin care cosmetics, the average WTP was 56,950 won which was 13.9% higher than the reference price, 50,000 won. For high-priced makeup cosmetics, the average WTP was 55,650 won, which was 11.3% higher than the reference price. Overall, the WTP was higher in order of low-priced skin care, low-priced makeup, high-priced skin care, and high-priced makeup. It means that consumers decide degree of premium based on the price and the attributes of eco-friendly products. Third, the findings showed that age, monthly income, and having children or not were statistically significant factors that influenced consumers’ willingness to pay for eco-friendly cosmetics. Other explanatory variables such as education, marital status, job, purchase experience of eco-friendly products, and environmental concerns did not show any statistical significance. The major contribution of this study is the investigation of the value of green attributes of the products by using CVM. Unlike most previous researches, this research used two methods of CVM, the dichotomous choice and the payment card, so it enhanced the reliability of research. According to this study, consumers showed price sensitivity when they pay green premium. These findings can be used as useful information to establish marketing strategies for green cosmetics.

Abstract

Environmental concern has been an important issue for a few decades, and the extent of consumer demand for eco-friendly consumption has been increased. This study seeks to investigate consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for eco-friendly cosmetics. This study evaluates how much more a consumer is willing to pay for eco-friendly cosmetics and examines significant factors influencing consumers’ WTP for eco-friendly cosmetics. Consumers’ WTP is measured using four different eco- friendly cosmetics: low-priced skin care cosmetics, low-priced makeup cosmetics, high-priced skin care cosmetics, and high-priced makeup cosmetics. This study uses the contingent valuation method (CVM) to estimate consumer’s WTP for eco-friendly cosmetics. Survey questions were designed using both dichotomous choice and payment card method of CVM. Through face to face interviews and on-line surveys, the data were collected from women between 20 and 49 years old residing in Seoul and Kyeonggi area, Korea, in May 2010. A total of 226 questionnaires (132 from interviews and 94 from on-line) were included for the analytical sample in this study. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, T-test and Log-Logit analysis. The findings are as follows:First, the WTP measured by dichotomous choice method was estimated using the Log-Logit analysis. The results showed that the estimated WTP for low-priced skin care cosmetics was 19,152 won, which was 27.7% higher than the reference price, 15,000 won. For low-priced makeup cosmetics, the estimated WTP was 18,524 won, and its green premium was 21.0%. The estimated WTP for high-priced skin care cosmetics was 59,128 won, which was 18.3% higher than the reference price, 50,000 won. For high-priced makeup cosmetics was 57,666 won, and its green premium was 15.3%. Second, the WTP measure by payment card method was estimated using descriptive analysis. The results showed that the respondents were willing to pay 17,955 won for low-priced skin care cosmetics, which was 19.7% higher than the reference price, 15,000 won and 17,595 won for low-priced makeup cosmetics, which was 17.3% higher than the reference price. For high-priced skin care cosmetics, the average WTP was 56,950 won which was 13.9% higher than the reference price, 50,000 won. For high-priced makeup cosmetics, the average WTP was 55,650 won, which was 11.3% higher than the reference price. Overall, the WTP was higher in order of low-priced skin care, low-priced makeup, high-priced skin care, and high-priced makeup. It means that consumers decide degree of premium based on the price and the attributes of eco-friendly products. Third, the findings showed that age, monthly income, and having children or not were statistically significant factors that influenced consumers’ willingness to pay for eco-friendly cosmetics. Other explanatory variables such as education, marital status, job, purchase experience of eco-friendly products, and environmental concerns did not show any statistical significance. The major contribution of this study is the investigation of the value of green attributes of the products by using CVM. Unlike most previous researches, this research used two methods of CVM, the dichotomous choice and the payment card, so it enhanced the reliability of research. According to this study, consumers showed price sensitivity when they pay green premium. These findings can be used as useful information to establish marketing strategies for green cosmetics.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Alwitt, L., "Predicting Purchase Intentions for an Environmentally Sensitive Product", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(1), pp.49~64 (1996)
  2. Ba, S. L., "Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building, Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums &Buyer Behavior", MIS Quarterly, 26(3), pp.243~268 (2002)
  3. Chase D., "Consumers Keen on Green But Marketers Don’t Deliver", Advertising Age, 63(6), pp.S2~S6 (1992)
  4. Follows, S. B., "Environmentally Responsible Purchase Behavior", European Journal of Marketing, 34(56), pp.723~746 (2000)
  5. 하홍열, "친환경 유리제품에 대한 소비자의 구매의도에 관한 연구: 프리미엄 가격의 조절역할", 고객만족경영연구, 14(2), pp.85~105 (2012), 한국고객만족경영학회
  6. 허승욱, "친환경농산물의 지불의사금액 분석과 그린 마케팅 전략-수도권 소비자를 중심으로-", 한국유기농업학회지, 12(3), pp.317~332 (2004), 한국유기농업학회
  7. Lalit, M. J., "Green Marketing of Cosmetics and Toiletries in Thailand", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(3), pp.265~281 (1998)
  8. Landler, M., "Suddenly, Green Marketers Are Seeing Red Flags", Business Week, (25), pp.74~76 (1991)
  9. Lee, C. K., "Value Estimation of Ecological Tour Resources by Two Step CVM Approach", Korean Journal of Hospitality, 25(3), pp.173~187 (2006)
  10. 이창무, "조건부가치측정법을 이용한 U-Eco 주거단지 지불의사금액 추정", 국토계획, 43(3), pp.237~248 (2008), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  11. Moon, S. J., "Consumer Perception of Eco-Friendly Management System", 석사, pp.2009
  12. 김호, "유기 한우쇠고기에 대한 구매의향과 지불의사금액 추정", 한국유기농업학회지, 16(4), pp.367~390 (2008), 한국유기농업학회
  13. Kim, I. S., "A Study on the Relationship Between the Price Premium and the Perceived Quality Evaluation", Industrial Information Institute, 12(6), pp.13~30 (1999)
  14. Kleiner, A., "What Does It Mean To Be Green?", Harvard Business Review, 69(4), pp.38~47 (1991)
  15. "Price premiums hold on as U.S. organic produce market expands" (2005)[URL]
  16. Ottman, J. A., "Green Marketing" (1994), NCT Business Books
  17. Pearce, F., "The Consumer Are Not So Green", New Scientist, 13, 14, ~ (1990)
  18. Rao, A. R., "Price Premium Variations as a Consequence of Buyers’ Lack of Information", Journal of Consumer Research, 19, pp.412~423 (1992)
  19. Usitalo, L., "Are Environmental Attitude and Behavior Inconsistent", Scandinavian Political Studies, 13(2), pp.211~226 (1990)
  20. 윤성준, "소비재 제품의 제품 추구혜택, 구매체험이 소비자-브랜드 관계에 미치는 영향: 화장품 제품을 중심으로", 아시아마케팅저널, 13(2), pp.1~26 (2011), 한국마케팅학회
  21. 유은이, "서비스품질이 신뢰 및 가격프리미엄 지불의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 -서울시내 특1급 호텔레스토랑을 중심으로-", 호텔관광연구, 10(3), pp.130~142 (2008), 한국호텔관광학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)