Do good return policies work across cultures? Effect of lenient return policies on online shopper perceptions in Eastern culture
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
While good return policies are suggested as one of the critical services for e-commerce, ambivalence between the burden of the cost and shoppers’ satisfaction may prevent e-tailers from increasing their level of leniency. Based on the S-O-R model, this study has attempted to develop a grounded theory to explain how lenient return policies shape online shoppers’ perceptions and responses, with a focus on cultural influences in the relationship. In order to check the cultural effects of the lenient return policy, thirty two female and eleven male undergraduate students in South Korean shoppers, who are accustomed to strict return policies, participated in the semi-structured interview. A series of open- ended questions were designed to explore consumers’ reactions toward four different levels of the lenient return policy: from the strict type in South Korea to the lenient type in the U.S. Using qualitative research methods, this research has defined three types of dimensions of lenient return policy: return possible period, complexity of progress, and other restrictions. While previous researchers did not pay much attention, the last dimension, other restrictions, is shown to be the most significant in influencing online shoppers’ perceptions, especially in South Korea. Also, the impacts on online shoppers’ perceptions from the three types of sub-dimensions of return policy were somewhat different. Whereas a longer return possible period was considered more favorable, a medium level of complexity and restrictions were considered more desirable. In summary, this result showed that shoppers in Eastern cultures, i.e. South Korean online shoppers, seem favorable to a medium level of lenient return policies, while allowing for taking precautions against possible fraudulent behaviors and setting other restrictions. Therefore, most of retailers in South Korea recommended that e-tailers who adopt the most lenient return policies raise the bar to guard ethical shoppers from fraudulent users. Next, lenient return policies can enhance ease of use, usefulness, affect, and trust while relieving perceived risk, which is connected to intention to purchase, satisfaction, and loyalty. Interestingly, lenient return policies are more likely to change the behavioral responses of online shoppers, such as return and purchase, rather than change their attitudes or beliefs such as image, satisfaction, and loyalty. This tendency can be seen more clearly in the direct influences of return policy on responses. The reaction to lenient return policy is mostly the intention to return or to purchase. This suggests that return policy serves the e-tailers as a powerful tool in increasing online shoppers’ purchase intention at the moment of purchase. Therefore, e-tailers who plan to expand their market to eastern countries, including South Korea, have to build a shield of restrictions around their lenient return policy, rather than immediately applying their original liberalized return policy. Also, e-tailers in South Korea need to review their strict and undifferentiated return policies to deal with the unsatisfied reactions of online shoppers toward their normal return policies. Although the present study was confined to the return policies currently being practiced by popular e-tailers, it would be worthwhile to develop effective return policies separately for each country, especially South Korea, keeping the culture of the relevant country in mind.
Abstract
While good return policies are suggested as one of the critical services for e-commerce, ambivalence between the burden of the cost and shoppers’ satisfaction may prevent e-tailers from increasing their level of leniency. Based on the S-O-R model, this study has attempted to develop a grounded theory to explain how lenient return policies shape online shoppers’ perceptions and responses, with a focus on cultural influences in the relationship. In order to check the cultural effects of the lenient return policy, thirty two female and eleven male undergraduate students in South Korean shoppers, who are accustomed to strict return policies, participated in the semi-structured interview. A series of open- ended questions were designed to explore consumers’ reactions toward four different levels of the lenient return policy: from the strict type in South Korea to the lenient type in the U.S. Using qualitative research methods, this research has defined three types of dimensions of lenient return policy: return possible period, complexity of progress, and other restrictions. While previous researchers did not pay much attention, the last dimension, other restrictions, is shown to be the most significant in influencing online shoppers’ perceptions, especially in South Korea. Also, the impacts on online shoppers’ perceptions from the three types of sub-dimensions of return policy were somewhat different. Whereas a longer return possible period was considered more favorable, a medium level of complexity and restrictions were considered more desirable. In summary, this result showed that shoppers in Eastern cultures, i.e. South Korean online shoppers, seem favorable to a medium level of lenient return policies, while allowing for taking precautions against possible fraudulent behaviors and setting other restrictions. Therefore, most of retailers in South Korea recommended that e-tailers who adopt the most lenient return policies raise the bar to guard ethical shoppers from fraudulent users. Next, lenient return policies can enhance ease of use, usefulness, affect, and trust while relieving perceived risk, which is connected to intention to purchase, satisfaction, and loyalty. Interestingly, lenient return policies are more likely to change the behavioral responses of online shoppers, such as return and purchase, rather than change their attitudes or beliefs such as image, satisfaction, and loyalty. This tendency can be seen more clearly in the direct influences of return policy on responses. The reaction to lenient return policy is mostly the intention to return or to purchase. This suggests that return policy serves the e-tailers as a powerful tool in increasing online shoppers’ purchase intention at the moment of purchase. Therefore, e-tailers who plan to expand their market to eastern countries, including South Korea, have to build a shield of restrictions around their lenient return policy, rather than immediately applying their original liberalized return policy. Also, e-tailers in South Korea need to review their strict and undifferentiated return policies to deal with the unsatisfied reactions of online shoppers toward their normal return policies. Although the present study was confined to the return policies currently being practiced by popular e-tailers, it would be worthwhile to develop effective return policies separately for each country, especially South Korea, keeping the culture of the relevant country in mind.
참고문헌 (61)
- Aaker, J. L., "Accessibility or diagnosticity? Disentangling the influence of culture on persuasion processes and attitudes", Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), pp.340~357 (2000)
- AT Kearney, "E-commerce is the next frontier in global expansion", ~ (2012)
- Babakus, E., "Reactions to unethical consumer behavior across six countries", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(4), pp.254~263 (2004)
- Baker, J., "The role of the environment in marketing services: The consumer perspective, In The Services Challenge: Integrating for Competitive Advantage", pp.79~84 (1987), American Marketing Association
- Barnett, T. P., "Humaninduced changes in the hydrology of the Western United States", Science, 319(5866), pp.1080~1083 (2008)
- Bitner, M. J., "Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees", Journal of Marketing, 56(2), pp.57~71 (1992)
- Bonifield, C., "Product returns on the Internet: A case of mixed signals?", Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), pp.1058~1065 (2010)
- Calhoun, K. J., "Impact of national culture on information technology usage behaviour: An exploratory study of decision making in Korea and the USA", Behaviour & information technology, 21(4), pp.293~302 (2002)
- Charmaz, K., "Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (Introducing qualitative methods series)" (2006), Sage
- Cherrier, H., "Consumer identity and moral obligations in non-plastic bag consumption: A dialectical perspective", International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30, pp.515~523 (2006)
- Chen, J., "Consumer trust in the online retail context: Exploring the antecedents and consequences", Psychology and Marketing, 27(4), pp.323~346 (2010)
- Clavin, B., "Focus Groups on Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs, In The Ethical Consumer", pp.173~187 (2005), Sage
- Davis, F. D., "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp.319~340 (1989)
- Davis, L., "Cultural influences on emotional responses to on-line store atmospheric cues", Journal of Business Research, 61(8), pp.806~812 (2008)
- Davis, J., "Minor adjustments, such as a simple return policy, can increase e-tail sales", InfoWorld, 23(7), pp.78~ (2001)
- Davis, S., "Return policies and the optimal level of hassle", Journal of Economics and Business, 50(5), pp.445~460 (1998)
- Donovan, R. J., "Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach", Journal of Retailing, 58(1), pp.34~57 (1982)
- Eroglu, S. A., "Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications", Journal of Business Research, 54(2), pp.177~184 (2001)
- Eroglu, S. A., "Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses", Psychology and Marketing, 20(2), pp.139~150 (2003)
- Fiore, A. M., "An integrative framework capturing experiential and utilitarian shopping experience", International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(6), pp.421~442 (2007)
- Frost, D., "Individualist and collectivist factors affecting online repurchase intentions", Internet research, 20(1), pp.6~28 (2010)
- Ha, Y., "Role of website design quality in satisfaction and word of mouth generation", Journal of Service Management, 23(1), pp.4~4 (2012)
- Harris, L. C., "Fraudulent return proclivity: an empirical analysis", Journal of Retailing, 84(4), pp.461~476 (2008)
- Hofstede, G., "Cultur's Consequences, Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations" (2001), Sage Pubications
- Hofstede, G., "The Confucius Connection: From cultural roots to economic growth", Organisational Dynamics, (Spring), pp.5~21 (1998)
- Hsieh, T., "Delivering happiness: A path to profits, passion, and purpose" (2010), Business Plus
- Hwang, W., "Internationalisation of e-commerce: a comparison of online shopping preferences among Korean, Turkish and US populations", Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(1), pp.3~18 (2006)
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., "Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2) (1999)
- Jeong, S. W., "The role of experiential value in online shopping: The impacts of product presentation on consumer responses towards an apparel web site", Internet research, 19(1), pp.105~124 (2009)
- Ketzenberg, M.E., "Optimal pricing, ordering, and return policies for consumer goods", Production and operations management, 18(3), pp.344~360 (2009)
- Kim, D.J., "A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents", Decision Support Systems, 44(2), pp.544~564 (2003)
- Kim, R., "Initial trust, perceived risk, and the adoption of internet banking", Proceeding ICIS '00 Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on Information systems, pp.537~543 (2000)
- King, T., "The management of deshopping and its effects on service : A mass market case study", International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(9), pp.720~733 (2007)
- King, T., "Myopia, customer returns and the theory of planned behaviour", Journal of Marketing Management, 24(1-2), pp.185~203 (2008)
- Ko, H., "Cross-cultural differences in perceived risk of online shopping", Journal of Interactive Advertising, 4(2), pp.20~49 (2004)
- Lau, H-S., "Manufacturer's pricing strategy and return policy for a single-period commodity", European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), pp.291~304 (1999)
- Lee, M.K., "An exploratory research on consumer perceptions of risk in the Internet shopping", Asia Marketing Journal, 2(4), pp.36~53 (2000)
- Levitt, T., "The globalization of markets", Harvard Business Review, 61(3), pp.92~102 (1983)
- 2012 outlook for the Retail and distributions in South Korea, "Lotte distribution strategy research institute", ~ (2011)
- Manganari, E. E., "Virtual store layout effects on consumer behaviour: Applying an environmental psychology approach in the online travel industry", Internet research, 21(3), pp.326~348 (2011)
- Mehrabian, A., "An approach to environmental psychology" (1974), MIT Press
- Mostard, J., "The newsboy problem with resalable returns: A single period model and case study", European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), pp.81~96 (2006)
- Moon, J., "Culture, product type, and price influences on consumer purchase intention to buy personalized products online", Journal of Business Research, 61(1), pp.31~39 (2008)
- Mukhopadhyay, S.K., "Reverse logistics in e-business: Optimal price and return policy", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(1), pp.70~89 (2004)
- Mummalaneni, V., "An empirical investigation of Web site characteristics, consumer emotional states and on-line shopping behaviors", Journal of Business Research, 58(4), pp.526~532 (2005)
- Pavlou, P.A., "Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior", MIS Quarterly, 30(1), pp.115~143 (2006)
- Samiee, S., "The Internet and International Marketing: Is There a Fit?, In Internet Marketing: Readings and Online Resources", pp.2001, McGraw-Hill
- Sautter, P., "E-tail atmospherics: a critique of the literature and model extension", Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 5(1), pp.14~24 (2004)
- Shaw, D., "Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption", Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), pp.167~185 (2002)
- Press release for 2011 report on e-commerce and cyber-shopping trends in South Korea, "Statistics Korea", ~ (2011)
- Strauss, A. L., "Basics of qualitative research" (1998), Sage
- Takada, H., "Cross-National Analysis of Diffusion of Consumer Durable Goods in Pacific Rim Countries", Journal of Marketing, 55(2), pp.48~54 (1991)
- Thompson, M.M., "Let’s not be indifferent about Attitudinal Ambivalence, In Attitude Strength： Antecedents and Consequences", pp.361~386 (1995), Erlbaum
- 2011 research on the Internet consumer trends in South Korea, "The Korea Chamber of Commerce & Industry", ~ (2011)
- Wang, L. C., "Can a retail web site be social?", Journal of Marketing, 71(3), pp.143~157 (2007)
- Watchter, K., "Exploring consumer orientation toward returns: unethical dimensions", Business Ethics : A European Review, 21(1), pp.115~128 (2012)
- Wood, S. L., "Remote purchase environments: The influence of return policy leniency on two-stage decision processes", Journal of Marketing Research, pp.157~169 (2001)
- Yoon, S., "An economic perspective to improve the refund system for consumer protection", Journal of Consumer Policy Studies, 31(4), pp.82~99 (2007)
- Yoon, C., "The effects of national culture values on consumer acceptance of ecommerce: Online shoppers in China", Information & management, 46(5), pp.294~301 (2009)
- Zaichkowsky, J.L., "A Global Look at Consumer Involvement and Use of Products", International Marketing Review, 6(1), pp.20~35 (1989)
- Zou S., "Global strategy: a review and an integrated conceptual framework", European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), pp.52~69 (1996)