본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

A Review on the Meaning of DIGITAL EVIDENCE and Its Requirements

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Due process, discovery of substantive truth, and the timeliness and efficiency of the procedures are the values of criminal litigation are still valid principles in the age of digital information. However, the way to implement these principles according to the properties of digital evidence remains as a challenge, and the field of digital evidence requires close cooperation between legal and technical sectors. In particular, the level of production and distribution of digital technology and digital devices in Korea has maintained the highest level in the world. Nonetheless, it is a reality that if the defendant denies the crucial digital evidence obtained in accordance with the due process by a court issued by the judiciary in the trial process, the evidence is denied. As a result, most defendants do not recognize evidence as a counter-party to the state during the criminal trial for digital evidence that is directly or indirectly related to the assertion of the criminal's own crime, Discussion is needed. In addition, even in the case of a recent series of events related to national security, the general law of criminal justice is applied to digital evidence as it is, so it is necessary to examine the exceptional rules for applying the special law on serious infringement of legal interests. In addition, the criminal evidence law for the serious crimes that occur in the digital information age is also implemented professionally and covertly. Therefore, the legislation that appropriately reflects the current situation and environment of digital information is necessary.

Abstract

Due process, discovery of substantive truth, and the timeliness and efficiency of the procedures are the values of criminal litigation are still valid principles in the age of digital information. However, the way to implement these principles according to the properties of digital evidence remains as a challenge, and the field of digital evidence requires close cooperation between legal and technical sectors. In particular, the level of production and distribution of digital technology and digital devices in Korea has maintained the highest level in the world. Nonetheless, it is a reality that if the defendant denies the crucial digital evidence obtained in accordance with the due process by a court issued by the judiciary in the trial process, the evidence is denied. As a result, most defendants do not recognize evidence as a counter-party to the state during the criminal trial for digital evidence that is directly or indirectly related to the assertion of the criminal's own crime, Discussion is needed. In addition, even in the case of a recent series of events related to national security, the general law of criminal justice is applied to digital evidence as it is, so it is necessary to examine the exceptional rules for applying the special law on serious infringement of legal interests. In addition, the criminal evidence law for the serious crimes that occur in the digital information age is also implemented professionally and covertly. Therefore, the legislation that appropriately reflects the current situation and environment of digital information is necessary.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Research on Determining the Admissibility of Digital Evidence, "Son JY", Judicial Policy Research Institute, ~ (2015)
  2. "Supreme Court. 2000Do4993", ~ (2003)
  3. "Supreme Court. 2004Do6132", ~ (2005)
  4. Park HS, "Evidence Admissibility of Digital Evi-dence in Reformed Criminal Procedure Act", Institute of Justice, ~ (2009)
  5. Kim BS, "Digital Evidence and Forensics", Infor-mation & Communication Policy, 21(6), pp.37~54 (2009)
  6. Jeon MG, "Collection and Admissibility of Dig-ital Evidence", Korean Law Association, 41, pp.317~336 (2011)
  7. Kwon OG, "The Digital Evidence and Admissi-bility of Evidence", IT & Law Research, 5, pp.291~318 (2011)
  8. 이완규, "협박 진술 녹음의 전문증거 문제와 진정성 문제의 구별- 대법원 2012. 9. 13. 선고 2012도7461 판결 -", 저스티스, 139, pp.372~401 (2013), 한국법학원
  9. Jeon SS, "A Study on Search Seizure and Ad-missibility of Digital Evidence in Criminal Procedure", Doc-toral, pp.2011
  10. A Study on the Digital Evi-dence Collection Procedure in Digital Foren-sic and the Admissibility of Digital Evidence, "Tak HS", Korean Institute of Criminology, ~ (2006)
  11. Jo SS, "A Study on Integrity Assurance Pro-cess to Improve Legal Force of Digital Evi-dence", New Tendency of Criminal Act, 27, pp.64~109 (2010)
  12. Kim YS, "The Admissibility of Digi-tal Evidence: Proving Authenticity of the Dig-ital Evidence and Overcoming Hearsay Bar-rier", Korean Criminological Review, 26(2), pp.165~214 (2015)
  13. "Lorraine V. Markel Am Ins Co 241 FRD. 534537-38", ~ (2007)
  14. Evidence Admissibility and Search and Seizure of Digital Evidence in U.S. Cloud Computer, "Ha DW", Institute of Justice, ~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)