본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Ch’oe Han-gi’s Reflection on Relationalities in Existence

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Since the middle of the 19th century, East Asia, especially Korea, was oppressed externally by the imperialism of Japan and others while internally long-lasting political convention like in-law government was driving the country into troubles at home and abroad. Witnessing such a situation and building up scholarly capability through reading over nearly all spheres, a Confucian philosopher, Ch’oe Han-gi (崔漢綺, 1803-1877), philosophized about the clue to the solution of such a choking phenomenon. Ch’oe believed that there was movement, ki (matter, material force, energy) of revolving transformation inherent in all things, people, or objects. Grasping even the principle and order of existence inherent in things from the viewpoint of ki, he tried to change the traditional theory on the law of existence of things that there existed an ontological reason lacking in motility, which was more dominant than anything existing in the universe and which ruled over the world. From this, he elucidated that the Way, an identity that rules over all affairs and things, was not simply one but diverse. This means, on one hand, that he tentatively accepted the relativity of things. On the other hand, he also taught us “oneness in all things” in which all including human beings exist in close connection to each other transcending the relativity or “agreement” in which they exist in harmony as one and “unity” in which they are united into one.

Abstract

Since the middle of the 19th century, East Asia, especially Korea, was oppressed externally by the imperialism of Japan and others while internally long-lasting political convention like in-law government was driving the country into troubles at home and abroad. Witnessing such a situation and building up scholarly capability through reading over nearly all spheres, a Confucian philosopher, Ch’oe Han-gi (崔漢綺, 1803-1877), philosophized about the clue to the solution of such a choking phenomenon. Ch’oe believed that there was movement, ki (matter, material force, energy) of revolving transformation inherent in all things, people, or objects. Grasping even the principle and order of existence inherent in things from the viewpoint of ki, he tried to change the traditional theory on the law of existence of things that there existed an ontological reason lacking in motility, which was more dominant than anything existing in the universe and which ruled over the world. From this, he elucidated that the Way, an identity that rules over all affairs and things, was not simply one but diverse. This means, on one hand, that he tentatively accepted the relativity of things. On the other hand, he also taught us “oneness in all things” in which all including human beings exist in close connection to each other transcending the relativity or “agreement” in which they exist in harmony as one and “unity” in which they are united into one.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Ch’oe, Han-gi, "Myŏngnamnuchŏnchip (The Complete Collections of Writings by Ch’oe Han-gi)" (1986), Yŏgang Press
  2. Ch’oe, Han-gi, "Ch’uch’ŭngnok (The Records on Inferring Objects) Vols.: 2, 6, Kich’ŭkch’eŭi (To Infer the Essential meaning of any object from ki)", ~ (1836)
  3. Ch’oe, Han-gi, "Kihak (The learning of ki)", ~ (1857)
  4. Ch’oe, Han-gi, "Vols.: 8, 9, 12, 22, 23, Inchŏng (Politics by the way of Humanity)", ~ (1860)
  5. Chu Hsi, "Miscellaneous, Great Order, Zhuxiji (The Collections of Chu Hsi’s Works) Vol. 70", ~
  6. Hwang, Yun-sŏk, "The Letter to Kim Ŭi-baek, Ichaenango (A Collection of Hwang Yun-sŏk’s Works) Vol. 1", ~
  7. Yoo, Gil-joon, "On the evils of sentences needed in state examination, Part of poetry, The Complete Works on Yoo Gil-joon, Vol. 5", pp.239~242 (1971), Ilchogak
  8. Zhu Xi, "Zhuziyulei" (1986), Zhonghua shuju
  9. Cheng Hao, "da yangshi lun ximing shu, Henan Cheng’s Collection of Works, Vol. 9", pp.609~ (1981), Chinese Book Corporation
  10. Son Byeong Ook, "Kihak–Cosmology of a Chosun person in the 19th century", pp.373~375 (2004), Tongnamoo
  11. James Legge, "The I Ching XXXI", ~ (1899)
  12. James Legge, "Li Ki XVI, Hsio Ki (or Record on the Subject of Education) Chapter 1", ~ (1885)
  13. Wing Tzit, Chan, "A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy", pp.523~524, Princeton University Press
  14. Loger T. Ames, "The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation" (1999), Random House Publishing Group
  15. Edward W. Wagner, "A New History of Korea (Hanguksa sillon by Lee Ki-baik)", pp.298~299 (1961), Harvard University Asia Center
  16. Lee, Wan-jae, "A Study of Park Gyu-su", pp.215~ (1999), Chimmundang
  17. Lee, Woo-sung, "An Explanation on Myŏngnamnuchŏnchip(1985), The Complete Collections of Writings by Ch’oe Han-gi" (1986), Yŏgang Press
  18. Martin Heidegger, "Sein und Zeit", pp.371~ (2006), Max Niemeyer Verlag
  19. Park, Gyu-su, "The Letter to Ongyŏng, The Complete Books of Hwanjae Vol. 8", pp.556~557 (1996), Eastern Studies Institute of Sungkyunkwan University
  20. Chun, Jin-sung, "Yŏksaga Giŏgŭl Malhada (History Tells Memory)", pp.48~49 (2006), Humanist
  21. 崔英辰,, "崔漢綺 運化論의 생태학적 해석", 대동문화연구, 11(45), pp.119~139 (2004), 대동문화연구원
  22. Burton Watson, "Discussion on making all things Equal. The complete works of Chuang Tzu", pp.40~41 (1968), Columbia University
  23. Hsü Fu-kuan, "Zhongguo jen-hsing lun-shih: Hsien Chin pien (The History of the Chinese Philosophy of Human Nature. The Pre-Chin Period)", pp.20~21 (1969), Taiwan shangwuyin shukuan
  24. 權五榮, "惠岡 최한기의 학문과 사상 연구", 박사, 한국사일반, pp.1994
  25. Mou Zongsan, "Zhong guo zhe xuede tezhi (The Characteristics of Chinese Philosophy)", pp.12~13 (1963), Taiwan Xuesheng Shuju
  26. Park, Chong-hong, "Empiricism of Ch’oe Han-gi", Korea Journal, 15(6), pp.67~ (1975)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)