박로술(朴魯述)의 외필론(猥筆論)

Abstract

This article deals with the life of Park Rosool, who represents Ki Jeongjin's disciples in Gwangju, and the theory of eopil猥筆. He wrote "Byuneopilbyun辨猥筆辨" between the late 1902 and the second half of 1903. This is a counterargument to Eopilbyun of Jeon Woo, in 1902. Eopilbyun was a critic of Eopil by Ki Jeongjin, who was written in 1878. Park Rosool's writings in the course of the Eopil-debate are an example of how the Nosa school tried to defend and defend Eopil and Ki Jeongjin's Neo-Confucianism from outside critical arguments centered on Kanjae around 1903. ByunEopilbyun's content was made up of 21 articles, the most important point being to refute Eopil's criticism of his opposition to the Yulgok. On this basis, the key contents are summarized into three. First, Park Ro-sool used the word 'juli主理', which is a word for Nosa school, as the background of his Neo-Confucian thoughts. Second, the genealogy of Ki Jeong-jin was connected to Zhū xī through Yulgok Neo-Confucianism from Juli's point of view. In this way, the academic status of the Neo-Confucian genealogy leading to Zhū xī, Yi yi and Ki jeongjin was emphasized. Third, based on this, he argued that it was Eopi's intention to interpret Yulgok's statement as limited to the aspect of the phenomenon. In the end, ByunEopilbyun is a work that focuses on the aim of enhancing the academic status of Ki Jeongjin and places academic issues around him. Perhaps this is why ByunEopilbyun, which started with criticism of Eopilbyun, ends up claiming the ideological consensus of Zhū xī̄, Yi yi and Ki jeongjin. In this regard, Byun Eopilbyun clearly shows the characteristics of a representative author that can understand the externalities of writers in Honam region.