寒洲學派와 艮齋學派의 義理實踐에 관한 논쟁

Abstract

The controversy over practice the righteousness the Hanjoo school and the Ganjae school of theory were mentality. Hanjoo assert mentality principle but Ganjae assert nature teacher mentality student. the Hanjoo school because the mentality is the principle thought that human beings are able to practice the righteousness well. Accordingly there is a possibility that the more positive practice can come out. On the contrary, the Ganjae school because the mentality is the vitality thought that the evil behavior of human beings comes out. By reason of this, the Ganjae school thought that the righteousness can be practiced on the basis of the genuine nature. Therefore, it may be interpreted that from the standpoint of the practices the Ganjae school presented the more cautious side. For that reason, it may be interpreted that the Hanjoo school led the Paris Matter of the Long Letter, and so on. The Ganjae school did not participate in the Paris Matter of the Long Letter. The protection of Confucianism by entering the isolated island of the western sea was absorbed in the education of the younger generation. Judging from this, it may be said that the debate about the mentality of the two schools was in how to practice the righteousness ultimately.