A Case of Re-implantation at a Failed Site Using Alveolar Ridge Preservation with Open-healing Approach: A 5-year Follow-up
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Immediate re-implantation after implant removal is ideal in terms of reduced treatment duration. However, in a case of severe peri-implantitis, it is difficult to predict three-dimensional changes after explantation. Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is an effective approach to avoid enormous soft and hard tissue augmentation. It can also reduce patient discomfort. A 55 year old patient had an implant with severe bone loss in the mandibular right first molar area. Implant removal and ARP with an open-healing approach were performed using xenogeneic bone graft and collagen membrane. The implant was placed four months after ARP. The 5-year follow-up revealed that the bone and implant conditions were maintained without any complications.
Abstract
Immediate re-implantation after implant removal is ideal in terms of reduced treatment duration. However, in a case of severe peri-implantitis, it is difficult to predict three-dimensional changes after explantation. Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is an effective approach to avoid enormous soft and hard tissue augmentation. It can also reduce patient discomfort. A 55 year old patient had an implant with severe bone loss in the mandibular right first molar area. Implant removal and ARP with an open-healing approach were performed using xenogeneic bone graft and collagen membrane. The implant was placed four months after ARP. The 5-year follow-up revealed that the bone and implant conditions were maintained without any complications.
참고문헌 (20)
- Avila-Ortiz G, "Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Dent Res, 93, pp.950~958 (2014)
- Fransson C, "Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants", Cli Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.440~446 (2005)
- Misch CE, "Implant success, survival, and failure : the International Congress of Oral Implantologists(ICOI)pisa consensus conference", Implant Dent, 17, pp.5~15 (2008)
- Schropp L, "Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction : a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 23, pp.313~323 (2003)
- Chrcanovic BR, "Survival of dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.1348~1353 (2017)
- Grossmann Y, "Success and survival of single dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants", J Periodontol, 78, pp.1670~1674 (2007)
- Cardaropoli D, "Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane : a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 32, pp.421~430 (2012)
- Engler-Hamm D, "Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure : a comparative clinical trial", J Periodontol, 82, pp.377~387 (2011)
- 박정철, "The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 46(6), pp.415~425 (2016), 대한치주과학회
- Quirynen M, "Predisposing conditions for retrograde peri-implantitis, and treatment suggestions", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.599~608 (2005)
- Jensen AT, "Complications related to bone augmentation procedures of localized defects in the alveolar ridge. A retrospective clinical study", Oral Maxillofac Surg, 20, pp.115~122 (2016)
- Mardinger O, "A retrospective analysis of replacing dental implants in previously failed sites", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 114, pp.290~293 (2012)
- Kim YK, "Prognosis of the implants replaced after removal of failed dental implants", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 110, pp.281~286 (2010)
- Chiapasco M, "Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations : a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.113~123 (2009)
- Dahlin C, "Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.159~165 (1991)
- Laass A, "Histologic outcomes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing individually shaped block versus particulate bone substitutes", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 40, pp.519~527 (2020)
- Troeltzsch M, "Clinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation : A systematic review", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 44, pp.1618~1629 (2016)
- Mir-Mari J, "Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials : an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.258~265 (2016)
- Benic GI, "Hard tissue changes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing block versus particulate bone substitutes : 6-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 30, pp.1016~1026 (2019)
- Schwarz F, "Comparison of naturally occurring and ligature-induced peri-implantitis bone defects in humans and dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.161~170 (2007)