본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

关于“从来”和“从来”句

Study on “Conglai(从来)” and the “Conglai” Sentence

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In recent years, many linguists pay much attention on the Chinese adverb “Conglai”(从来) and the “Conglai” sentence(“从来”句). Till now they have made great research achievements on the grammar studies and other aspects. However, there are still many deficiencies in the study. This study discussed these problems and reached the following conclusions. First, “Conglai” has the emphasis function and can prominent semantic focus. In addition, “Conglai’ can help to express the aspect concept. Second, the presence or absence of the aspect particle “Guo”(过) is up to the sentence semantics, which is Static or Dynamic semantics. Third, the “Conglai” sentence can be used in a variety of contexts and has many kinds of pragmatic functions. Fourth, we compared the “conglai meiyou”(从来没有)sentence and the “conglai bu”(从来不) sentence on the semantic and pragmatic features. The “Conglai meiyou” sentence is about the objective expression, but the “Conglai bu” sentence emphasizes the position and attitude of the speaker or show that somebody has no some kind of habits.

Abstract

In recent years, many linguists pay much attention on the Chinese adverb “Conglai”(从来) and the “Conglai” sentence(“从来”句). Till now they have made great research achievements on the grammar studies and other aspects. However, there are still many deficiencies in the study. This study discussed these problems and reached the following conclusions. First, “Conglai” has the emphasis function and can prominent semantic focus. In addition, “Conglai’ can help to express the aspect concept. Second, the presence or absence of the aspect particle “Guo”(过) is up to the sentence semantics, which is Static or Dynamic semantics. Third, the “Conglai” sentence can be used in a variety of contexts and has many kinds of pragmatic functions. Fourth, we compared the “conglai meiyou”(从来没有)sentence and the “conglai bu”(从来不) sentence on the semantic and pragmatic features. The “Conglai meiyou” sentence is about the objective expression, but the “Conglai bu” sentence emphasizes the position and attitude of the speaker or show that somebody has no some kind of habits.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 陈昌来, "“从来”的词汇化历程及其指称化机制", 上海师范大学学报, (3) (2011)
  2. 陈梦娜, "“从来”与“从来”句的历时考察", 硕士, pp.2012
  3. 房玉清, "实用汉语语法" (2008), 北京语言学院出版社
  4. 冯春田, "汉语“从", 否”类副词的历史考察, 2005, pp.(4), ~
  5. 葛文杰, "“从来”句的语义、语用分析", 江西教育学院学报, (4) (2004)
  6. 匡鹏飞, "副词“从来”语法特点的历时差异及其解释", 汉语学报, (1) (2013)
  7. 李铁根, "“不”、“没有”的用法及其所受的时间制约", 汉语学习, (2) (2003)
  8. 李瑛, "“不”的否定意义", 语言教学与研究, (2) (1992)
  9. 刘甜, "“从来”“向来”与否定和肯定表达的匹配", 云南师范大学学报, (1) (2009)
  10. 念颖, "“从来”的词汇化及其演变机制", 云南师范大学学报, (6) (2010)
  11. 任海波, "“一直”与“从来”的比较分析", 广播电视大学学报, (1) (2005)
  12. 唐善生, "副词“从来”的语意及其句法特征", 汉语学习, (4) (2011)
  13. 唐为群, "“从来”和“从来”句", 语言研究, (3) (2007)
  14. 许建章, "副词“不”和“没有”同谓词组合所受的条件制约", 河南科技大学学报, (2) (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)